I am not sure if you aware of this issue. Or how well established is ypur history over the socialgraph account, the regent account, etc. But from my memory, they were created to obtain what the "foundation" called "security for the betterment of blurt" or something along those lines.
These accounts or more specifically the regent account, was given fake blurt power and was used to maintain certain witnesses in the top 20.
This same account started harvesting vests through votes and once acquired enough liquid wad given to socialgraph account ehich delegations are given out to other accounts such as blurtbooster.
It is also being used to pay themselves ie several foundation members with blurt acquired, in my eyes through nefarious means.
What's your opinion over having an account that obtained an incredible amount of blurtpower, that is not by any means obtained fairly such as buying or earning it, and is currently bleeding away the pools recognize at a fast rate?
I think this is why Blurt can't grow and prosper - it's covered in leeches.
I must honestly admit that I am completely unaware of this topic. I have read something about it when the discontent that several users expressed for something they called "false tokens" was evidenced in some articles.
Not being versed in this subject, I tried to learn, but still haven't achieved my goal, and I get confused in some aspects where others seem to be quite professors.
A few months ago, I read the thread that ctime, megadrive, mariuszkarowski, among others, had, talking about this and other topics, and I came to think that they had reached a good agreement since I never read about it again. If the agreements are still not favorable, I hope that at some point they will achieve this objective, since the idea is that we all win.
Good to know. I'll look into it.