This is taken from my ongoing conversation with top witness @Khrom, on how we can work together to identify, root out, and solve the issues of corruption, cronyism, and hypocrisy that currently prevent Blurt from being a relevant force in the crypto blockchain sphere.
I want to again open this up to the Blurt community at large, to get more eyes and minds on these problems which affect us all. We have amazing people here, and their input is invaluable. No matter how motivated, connected, and brave, two guys can't tackle this on their own. We will need a community effort. Thank you for reading, providing your input, and sharing this important discussion.
[ Note: If you are not engaging in corruption, cronyism, and/or hypocrisy, then you are not who we are talking about here. But if the shoe fits, then yes, you are under our magnifying glass. We have no intention to offend anyone - except those who deserve it. If you aren't guilty, then you aren't implicated by this personal conversation or community dialogue. If you are guilty, please absorb what is being said here, let it sink in, and consider working WITH the rest of the Blurt community rather than continuing to work AGAINST us. If you act appropriately, you could come out of this intact - even as a kind of hero - rather than the villains you currently are. Again, if this does not apply to you, then it is not directed at you. ]
(begin conversation with Khrom)
Thank you for your thoughtful reply, Khrom!
"I have written about it myself many times, unfortunately, the founders.. @megadrive apparently do not see a problem in their conduct. It's hard to tell if it's because of stupidity and ego or intentional action."
Whichever it is, it's a problem for everyone else here, including you and I. Perhaps it is all three? One thing is clear though, this could not happen (and go on for years) by accident. The corruption - and that IS the best word to describe it - is intentional.
For example, people like Richarde have the special responsibility to punish and stop users who farm BLURT by posting banal comments and self-voting them. As you said, this is necessary, because without downvotes, it is our only way of protecting the limited reward pool from being pillaged unfairly. But richarde himself is doing that, and also circle-jerking furiously with another insider, blurtyield. He is double- or triple-dipping into the reward pool that is the source of all profit on this blockchain. That is intentional corruption (and hypocrisy) by every possible definition. Who watches the watchers? Who polices the police? Currently on Blurt, nobody.
Many nights, I have votes left to dish out, and I am tempted to simply vote for all my own comments. This would be easy, and it would be very profitable. But in 8 months here, I've never done this. Why? Because I know it is corrupt, against accepted community norms, and because it is the epitome of poor curation. If we all did that, what real curation would ever occur here? So instead, I spend time and effort scouring the platform for OTHER people's comments to curate. But if our "leaders" don't set a good example for everyone else, and even punish those who do what they are doing, can we expect Blurt to succeed under rampant hypocrisy?
Let's also keep in mind that those who are profiting unfairly here are driving away potential investors, who will not touch this place as it currently stands with a ten foot pole. This makes it impossible for current investors and content-creators to compete, and drives them away.
Another factor is that these unjust profits are then being used to vote for witnesses who will continue the status quo - I notice you have been knocked back out of the #1 spot today. Witnesses are decided almost entirely by the corrupt insiders at the top, ensuring the corruption continues. This is cronyism. My hope is that more Blurtians join me in voting your witness and returning you to the top. Keeping a non-insider in that position advances our mission of decentralization.
I have long noticed that corrupt people (such as in government or any other position of power) often hide their corruption behind a guise of ego or stupidity. Yes, Megadrive is egotistical. It isn't a coincidence I nicknamed him "Megalomaniac". But that doesn't negate or excuse his exploitation. Another example is (fake) US president Joe Biden. Many people see his terrible leadership as stupidity, saying "he's old and senile". But his bigger crime is corruption, for he is owned and controlled by globalist powers and the deep state. We can't allow the excuse of stupidity or ego to stop us from rooting out corruption.
"This is also known as the main reason for the whole storm unleashed by investors and the alleged FUD".
Absolutely! And isn't it crazy the insiders' only defense when their corruption was called out in a way they couldn't just ignore, was to accuse their accusers of trying to collapse the price? Why would our biggest investors want to crash the token price? Absurd, but that was their only rationalization. "It's not us at fault... it's anyone who points out what we're doing!" Like when Julian Assange revealed corruption at the highest levels of US government, who countered by having him imprisoned and tortured.
"What can you do about it? The sum from the blurtbooster cannot be removed. On the one hand, the founders deserve it because they launched blurt... on the other hand, its constant multiplication in this way reflects negatively on this network."
I don't know how to decide what someone deserves or doesn't deserve. Maybe they do deserve the original stake they granted themselves. It doesn't actually matter, because the end result is that the blockchain can't succeed, and only the founders can profit here, at the expense of everyone else. I dumped a lot of money in here, and it has been reduced to almost nothing. Meanwhile, the insiders continue to profit every month, nonstop, draining all life from the community. Do they deserve that? I don't think so, but even if they do, it still means the death of Blurt for everyone but themselves and a few top witnesses, who will earn good money regardless. That's not acceptable.
You're right, we can't stop people from delegating to blurtbooster if they want to, which includes the insiders with their artificial stake. But there are things we can do, which would help Blurt survive and thrive! One option was brought up by @world-travel-pro, who is another ally of yours, in my last post on this topic. He said:
"I think we should give you... @drutter the keys the blurt booster account! and I'm dead serious. I've mentioned I'm not a fan of bots curating for reasons pointed out in your post. I absolutely will push to have you personally be a solution to some of these problems. You've proven yourself to be smart, pro blurt, and trustworthy. 100% I would love to see you running a huge curation account on the platform. Maybe we can get some momentum behind this idea, if you are up for it..."
I have thought about what he said, and I believe it has merit. It doesn't have to be me who does it, but that's a possibility (depending on the details). It could be anyone who has the time, understanding of Blurt, and trustworthiness. Manual human curation is real curation. Blanket curation is not curation at all, it is welfare and encouragement of farming.
Would it work? Well, I don't even know if those with the keys (which are probably the insiders themselves) could be convinced to do it. This is one of their biggest cash-cows. Without it, they will lose some of their power. It would absolutely improve things for everyone else here, but would they agree to it? I have noticed many users (including witnesses) supported my post, but the insiders did not, and did not even reply. Their best tactic is to try and avoid it, hoping it goes away. They do this every time the issue is brought up.
Another thought about the blurtbooster plan is that if implemented, and it went to manual curation instead of upvoting all content as a form of universal basic income, many of the delegators would withdraw their delegation. That's not necessarily a roadblock, but it means things would shake up around here. There would likely be positive and negative effects. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on it, and anyone else who has an opinion.
"In the future, for example, you can mark such users so that the frontends will show on their profile that they are doing this, and this will.. be discouraging for others to support them, so ultimately they will not be good at it.. You can also block them from curatorial votes in such a way that, for example, all accounts that are identified as taking part in it will not be able to vote for each other. which also puts some people off."
I agree, that would help to some degree, and would also put some people off. The argument would be that it is a form of censorship or shadowbanning.
Furthermore, some would argue that it would not fix the problem, because those with the ability to mark and block users this way are themselves the biggest perpetrators. We already have this problem - the ones who can stop circle-jerkers and farmers are the top circle-jerkers and farmers on Blurt! Handing them this power could actually just make things worse, as they would selectively mark and block others from doing it, while continuing to do it themselves.
This begs the question; "Are we screwed?" Can anything truly be done, if there is no will from the insiders to do it? Will they give up their golden goose? I don't know. Perhaps appealing to their intelligence might have an effect. If they can be convinced, then we have a chance.
Maybe we could start by presenting a united front - with investors, top content-creators, and witnesses. Together, we make up the bulk of the power on this platform, aside from the insiders. If we agree on a plan, even an ultimatum, perhaps we can wrest some control from the insiders. We could remind them that without us, all they have is their printed stake, like a Federal Reserve creating trillions of dollars but with nobody willing to use them. We could make it clear to them that we know the platform will continue to die if they don't release their chokehold on it, and eventually they too will go down with the ship.
Therefore, I'm very pleased we're having this conversation. A partnership between us is powerful. I assure you, we have the approval of a majority of users who are aware of our efforts. The silence of the insiders is the only non-positive reaction I've seen thus far. As this idea grows and expands, support will continue to grow. I think the time is finally right for some kind of action, especially if we plan and carry it out with courage and integrity.
The best part? This benefits everyone on Blurt, except those who continue to hold us back. Nobody needs to fear the scrutiny that comes with the light of day shining on this issue, unless they insist on being part of the problem. This is a massive move toward the decentralization that Blurt claims to espouse, but which has eluded us thus far. The vast majority of users will be empowered and advantaged, as will the platform itself. It could very well be the change Blurt needs to become a relevant community, blog site, and cryptocurrency. Fixing this major hole in our boat might not just allow us to stop sinking, but to sail the crypto seas.
In fact, there's a good chance that those currently monopolizing the Blurt reward pool would actually do well if we succeed, because they're not only holding back the regular users, they're holding back themselves as well! Whether they realize it now or not, they are their own worst enemies. Blurt is currently almost unknown, even in the crypto sphere, but it doesn't have to be! This blockchain has major advantages over any other, and could become one of the most prominent chains out there, if we could only fix the rot at its core. We have what it takes to do very well, and like I said recently, all it would take is a crypto bull market, and an influx of new content/investment, and BLURT has the realistic potential to go up by a factor of several hundred. The insiders currently squandering our potential would initially take a hit to their status, but it wouldn't destroy them, and when Blurt sprouts and blooms, they may look back on their former schemes as foolish, repressive, and fruitless. This could be the start of great things - even for the ones who currently rule this tiny kingdom.
Can I get a...
Maybe it is finally time for me to see what I need to do, in order to upgrade my technical acumen (and my PC), so that I can become a witness. I would do it not for the additional income, because what good are more tokens if the platform itself continues to shrivel? No, I would not do it for BLURT - I would do it for Blurt. The community, the platform, the legitimate content-creators and curators. If there are enough people who believe I would be valuable in a leadership position, I will make the time in my life so that it can happen.
I really appreciate your thoughts and advice on this. I'm glad you also see this as the most pressing issue on the Blurt platform, and that you aren't afraid to take it on. Thank you for your support, and please know that you have mine. I believe we can count on many other principled witnesses, creators, and curators to join us. One thing we have in common is that we care about Blurt and intend to see it succeed!
(end conversation with Khrom)
[ This post goes nicely with the following track: source]
Interesting publication, everything you say is true, about the founders and that the platform has many problems to solve, I was thinking that why do you want a business if you don't help it grow, because I don't see any interest. I have written ideas about Blurt, publicizing the platform, trying to push them to change the mindset and add Blurt to more exchanges, that's exposure and more people would join the platform, but they don't seem to care, they just do the blind They don't understand one thing, if you don't invest in your business, you will never grow. We are a community, where many people share ideas and content and it is better to generate wealth for everyone, that is the key, because not only they would win, everyone here would win. I also have a @team-mexico project on the platform for two years trying to build a community, trying to manually curate the content, but it's a lot of work and they don't turn around to see the effort one makes for the platform. Every day I try to get attention to get support and keep curating more content but it seems to no avail, only a few people have believed in me and I thank you for your support. In any case, with or without support, I will continue to do what I love and make Blurt grow. Just like you, we need more people who speak for the good of the community, people with values, who are aware and who seek the good for all, in this way wealth will grow for all, that is why we are here. And in the same way I think that the community must solve this problem of abuse, it is the only way that Blurt is going to be successful. We also need another bull market, but first we need to solve all the problems that plague us. I would be very grateful if you can help team-mexico a little, to curate more content.
Help grow and how do you do that?
More trades equals more transactions. for that more users
For more exchanges, it is first necessary to be attractive to more users.
It is easy to say that the problem is the developers and founders, when there is an open war to take control of the platform.
Why don't you ask for a consensus to exist between both parties in order to move forward?
Why should we tell a person what to do with their funds?
What if I tell you that you can't use your token to create a healing bot? ctime if you can? mega drive right?
You see the example of double standards.
The problem is not only to say that there is a low price, you have to see from when all this conflict originates
I remember when Double U said openly that he would start power down and send the price to hell, then Ctime and dog without balls said openly if they don't let us have control or eliminate this we will sell everything.
Guess who writes this comment? to the same ones who said they would sell everything.
Can I trust your name? Troll666, that doesn't look very reliable for a person who wants to give valid arguments. It's just that I don't understand the point of wanting to control the platform, because, unless they want to make it grow, I really don't understand why someone would want control of Blurt, the objective of Blurt is not that, the objective of Blurt is to grow the entire community, attract more people to publish interesting content, more services must be created and solid foundations created to make the platform attractive, among them, as you say, bring more people, but how do you do that, if people do not understand what Blurt is And in addition to that, you do not help him, a type of academy for new users must be created, with the publication of interesting guides. I don't know if you understood the point of the post, which is to raise awareness for the founders to do things right, they know what Blurt needs, but they don't do it or don't want to do it, because they only want revenue for themselves, no one else. This is a community and the platform should be attractive to everyone and help make life better for others, everyone equally or at least that the platform comes close to this point. That point is also important, an agreement between both parties, better because not everyone should get to work for the good of Blurt, not just one party or two, everyone has different ways of thinking and you will never agree with everyone, so stop playing blind and when you really support the platform that day will come a change and we will see that Blurt will be a success. At this point if no one cares about Blurt, we will never grow, why don't you invest in your business and shut the mouths of many people, because you don't do things right, communication, updates, support in votes to all kinds of people, create a dynamic to attract more developers, but they don't want to pay them, it's that easy, you really don't see that they want to make Blurt grow. Until when are they going to work in a real way for the community. I wonder, there are many ways to grow Blurt.
Speaking of curation bots, why do I want a bot, get to work, do things on your own merit, why do I want a bot that does not interact with the community. Do not know how much time curators invest in the community, do not know that a person invests many hours creating a publication, we must all work together with Blurt, curators, content creators, communities, developers, witnesses, founders. It is the only way we are going to get real interaction. We must value the work that all the people in Blurt do, we are all important, we must create wealth for everyone, we must work as a team, stop fighting like children, please, stop wasting your energy on something that is not good, start doing something productive and for the first time do something good for the community. Everyone is free to do what they want with their participation, because they invested time, money and effort and if it is no longer convenient, do what you want with your participation in the platform. I am not going to fight with that person, because he turned off his Blurt, he does it for a reason, as I said before, we must create wealth for everyone, equally. There are millions of people in the world that will see all the good in the platform, let's stop questioning and judging what a person does with his participation. Reach out to new people. I don't know who you are and I share my opinion with a lot of respect, I'm sick of it always being the same, from steemit, hive and now blurt. We have to change that. If you want to keep fighting do it, if you want to focus on changing the path of the platform do it, everyone do what you want, that's what the platform is about, freedom of expression, focus on growing the platform, focus on generating wealth for others. Nice day. ✨💕
What's stopping you from creating something for the platform? a frontend? a new wallet? a new application? new dapps?
Nobody is stopping the users. What I want to make you understand is that there are arguments that are issued with a double standard and I can expose them without being someone rude, which has nothing to do with the name. you trust a name MMMKKKKKK and not a troll? do you understand the point? or should I explain it?
Arguments:
there is an open war between ctime and mmk to control the blockchain, how do they wish to do this. Through the witnesses, at one point their voting power was centralized and they wanted to be able to remove and put witnesses that were only aligned with their thoughts, to sure anyone will tell me that megadrive does the same, in reality it happens in any graphene and cosmos blockchain. who has more voting power can choose or move their witnesses.
beyond being able to choose the witnesses, this group that you call investors I call them buyers of Blurt, they did not receive support from any of the witnesses, they wanted to make a forced acquisition claiming that the regent account was illegal but it was something that existed since the creation of blurt and is designed precisely to avoid these acquisitions.
based on the above then changed the dynamic to say that the airdrop of the founders, is not valid to what Mr. dog without balls called print stake, but look how it is ironic that in all blockchains there are these initial funds, even the same created bitcoin satoshi nakamoto has its initial funds that were never claimed, therefore it is a lie to say that you can not have initial funds, airdrop or other.
Is there an open war or not? do they want to manipulate those who make life in Blurt or not?
I find your point of view interesting, so keep on being the example. keep up the work you do. at some point you will get the rewards you deserve.
but one thing i am sure of, the developers will bring better innovations and there will be better incentives, but no thanks to no-ball dog and ctshit. by the way here is a kind message of how they wanted to manipulate the witnesses at that time.
My point about the curators is simple, I'm trying to say that people spend a lot of time on the platform and that wealth should be generated for everyone. The platform would be different if we all work together, real work.
I like how you avoid his points and instead try to create the narrative of what blurt is, as if its not what the funders wanted, and you essentially call the funders scammers, liars etc, which not only harm's the platform but you offer nothing of substance to show how and why it's a scam, which brings up the first question, why are you here if you think the people who run it, are so corrupt?
You make good points. Thanks for your support, and for doing what you can to build up this platform.
#letsgrowblurt
Thank you very much for bringing important topics like this to the table, for your dedication and commitment. You hit the nail on the head, congratulations for bringing such interesting content to the platform. I really admire your content, let's grow Blurt.
If you don't believe in the team behind Blurt, why are you still here? Why not fork it, as they did, and run your own, especially when you whine about the work you put in, so much work and no fucks given, but you persist in growing a place that you say doesn't care about you?
I hope "downvote" is non of the blurt's devs additional feature. Looking forward to seeing you in the witness list, you got my vote already.
It's not. Basically the only thing Blurt has going for it, is "no DV" to give that up makes no sense and all the witnesses know that. Zero concern on that part and you can take that to bank... ;)
Yeah, bullying, censorship, and financial abuse isn't a very good "feature". We've learned that lesson already!
Thanks very much for saying you'd vote for me. I'm definitely considering it, and will investigate what I'd need to do for it to happen.
We stepped in and did it with some of megadrive s stake as it was going wasted by not being spread around. At the kind of price blurt is and not really up voting ourselves, although I often see outofthematrix has upvoted me 🙏🏻 It does make it a little hRd to commit to it but between three of us we manage to keep our hand in and probably do more than it would be doing otherwise. I would just advise taking it on as a small circle cause it is hard to manage to its fullest on your own!
Thanks for the advice! One thing...
"did it with some of megadrive s stake as it was going wasted by not being spread around"
I don't think stake can really be "wasted", although I know what you meant. If upvotes aren't used, the reward pool isn't drained by that amount, and the rewards are still dished out. The only difference is, the account "wasting" their stake isn't part of the curation process (deciding where the limited reward pool is directed). So really, by using the large premined stake instead of letting it sit idle, there are no more BLURT being created, and no more BLURT being distributed, it's just that now you are deciding where a large amount of it is being sent. As you mentioned, more of it is now going to you, Tom, and Dan than it was before. Nothing was being wasted. Just saying.
I think that Out is the matrix is doing a lot of the upvoting tbh I find it difficult to commit to it every day which, is why it’s nice to spread it between a few people, I actually don’t upvote myself or the other two guys but I think Out of the matrix has sent me a few upvotes but he manages it every day pretty much and is rly super good with it and on it. I think it’s just harder to find a lot of good content right now tbh and we are always open to suggestions.
I’m
Not the most technical but It wasn’t always sitting there it was upvoting the same two or three ppl as understandably it’s owner didn’t have time to look around for any new contentZ I have to say tho with these prices it is just hard to put much time in full stop to curating or posting that takes away from real world work. If your making even 20 dollars a post you don’t mind having a look around for new content and putting some time in to moving that around.
Let's start from this:
let's put socialgraph funds (23M) in swap-pool on hive-engine (I think Hive already has multisig accounts)
these funds and profits will be locked in pool forever, this should limit the number of newly created BLURT and help stabilize BLURT price at higher level
this solution requires the sale of 11.5 M BLURT, the price will fall temporarily (no pain no gain) but it will be a chance for current and new players to to load up their accounts.
we could even burn profits
what do you think if you take half of what you have and burn it, the rest, obviously by raising the price you can still have significant profits with 2 million tokens at a reasonable price you would have thousands of dollars? let's start with you and let others take your example.
Go fuck yourself stupid troll, I'm giving you a sensible solution to the sitiuation that megadrive and his gang are in (they are in the deep shit). They probably won't use it, they prefer the risk of losing everything they illegally printed. As they don't have foundation, they will be prosecuted personally
megadrive is NEXT
You give an idea and I tell you that you can be the example to follow on this platform. But it is notorious that you have no balls. They have 17 million blurt in this platform burn 1.000.000 so you can see your earnings. don't send others to sing i you can sing very well. Ah but as you are in evidence is notorious that you have nothing to contribute but want others to leave aside their investments, but you invest, you say you are smart then be the example my dear dog without balls.
of course, let's start with ctime's and yours and then we can set an example from home, what do you say?
Sounds interesting, but I am lacking some technical understanding...
I don't know what a swap-pool is, or why that would require the sale of half that amount of BLURT. But perhaps if that is done, it could be done 1M at a time, to avoid cratering the price suddenly. A discount would be nice but a complete crash would mess some things up.
Maybe some of it should just be burned. They printed it from thin air... so back to thin air it could go...
I'm interested to see what would happen if you became a witness. I'm tired of every platform being a circle-jerk for rewards; meanwhile, there's barely any good content on the site. I can't find anybody who makes series about worthwhile topics. There's nothing to search and nobody to subscribe to, but youtube is an endless library of people who upload free, useful content, like exercise, how-to, cooking, and other channels. People don't treat their blog like a channel, but instead just like a facebook feed.
I told him to go for the witness a while back. But I know you've guys have had a ton on your plate. I'm going to go into the witness chat now, and drop a note pushing to get you @drutter running some of this blurtbooster curation money or something.
Thanks for recommending I go for it a while back. Things are soon going to be calming down for us, when we get possession of the whole house, and really unpack and settle in. January or February will mean more time for other stuff, assuming my health holds out! My content is already improving lately, as I have a bit of time and energy in between the move/settling and taking care of the little ones.
Is this the best info page about becoming a witness? Man, I have to admit, I don't recognize most of the words on that page. And it seems to say you have to be using Linux, and I am just using Windows. I guess there's a chance I could change everything around, but it would be expensive and difficult... probably a lot of money and time would have to go into it. But let me know if you have other info I can check out!
Just get a server provider, download putty terminal, and copy and past all this stuff in order.
https://gitlab.com/blurt/blurt/-/blob/dev/doc/witnesses/README.md
Also join discord chat so people can help you right away if there is an issue. I think @outofthematrix has better tech skills than myself. But I say on discord cause there are very helpful people there. I know, discord has issues, but that is where the help is....like 24/7 almost.
Yes we can help you... All you need is a server....
Lolol! The guy wants everything catered for and revealed to him, the effort alone of researching and finding it out for himself is daunting no doubt, and he's of the mentality that he knows what's best for everybody and he wants to form a posse to 'make it right', can you say entitled idiot?!
No I don't think so... He just needs a bit of help... 🤷♂️
He doesn't seem lost, confused or uncertain even, he's sure corruption is rampant and he blatantly proposed to form a posse "so everyone prospers", and I'll be the first to call it out, he is certified idiot, much like Marius who keeps buying fake stake in an operation he threatened multiple times with suing and reporting to the SEC, certified.
The idiot wants to form a posse and now is trying to validate blocks for the project he just dragged it's team through the muck! The idiot claims 'nObOdY wAnTs tO iNvEsT bEcAuSe cOrRuPtIOn' yet he invested all his crypto here, like a certificated moron, so he's "nobody: Certified Idiot". Much like Marius, he encourages and spreads FUD, plus he shits on the majority of users as 'farmers' and neither of them show signs of ANY confidence in Blurt besides their transparent stake grabbing.
Yes he's certified idiot, and to top it all off he's indignant that the people he smeared and attacked don't respond, so entitled idiot for sure, he needs 'help', to form a posse and 'prosper', poor him, he's not getting the rewards he dEsErVeS like ultra was kanked from her almost $700 post on hive, or the narscasistic rodent druter is feeding that declared that his posts ought to be worth $100 worth of steem, so too this indignant simpelton is mad at the 'farmers' and funders, da faq kind of moron reasons that the funders stake is fake because they didn't earn it or buy it.
Despicable, Detestable, Deranged, Entitled and Demented Moron.
I'll search for info on what a server provider is, and how to get one, and I'll download "putty terminal". Thanks! (How come this info isn't available on the blockchain, or in the Blurt FAQ? I notice there are 230+ witnesses here, amazing all those people figured it out despite the info not being easy to find!) I won't use Discord again, but I can ask for help on-chain, or by email if needed. I finally got a permanent home phone line installed, so there's the option of calling someone for help as well.
Sounds good buddy. Hot to start a blurt witness....not a bad addition to the FAQ indeed. You are right, feel free to reach ouy anyway that suits you best. Im here to help. Oh and really sorry hear that the spike seems to have landed on you. The real crisis is underway, covid was the set up.
Yes, your content is really good, and I'm glad you are interested in taking on more of leadership roll here. I think you will clearly become an even greater asset to the community.
I know... I'm hoping that will change when Blurt recovers from the stupor it's currently in.
First you should outline the Solutions to the problem, THEN agree on it and form your little cabal, but the better tactic is to bully up and tell the: STOP DOING WHAT WE DON'T LIKE!
the moronic retarded is as they think.
Yet here you are, in a place you detest, among your inferiors and other lowlifes, working literally for the people you and your hubby see as corrupt and are openly mocking and calling for their demise should they continue as they do.
Why keep propping up blurt? Why not move instead of extending this hostility and animosity and demeaning the community as your inferior?
Whine away, I'm sure productive isn't high on your list of traits!
I agree with most of your post, but the discussion on here is like watching baboons picking their arses.
Im not going to get into this other than to say things need to be raised a notch or two!
Fair enough! But your input is valued, should you care to give it.
Advice on the comment section, if you can't handle certain accounts, for example those which add little/nothing while at the same time trolling for negative reactions, use the mute feature. They just disappear from your experience completely. You never see their posts, their comments, their votes, nothing. They're just gone, from your perspective. It can really clean up a shitty comment section, with just a couple well placed mutes. It's not censorship, because the account is still able to do everything they did before, and everyone else (99.9999999% of the world) can still see them. It only affects your experience. Your sanity must be preserved! If they did happen to have an idea somewhere within their endless garbage, and it's both unique and valuable, then that idea will be brought forth again by someone else (not lost forever to you). Highly recommended. I don't even think the recipient of the muting gets a notification it happened. Their tactics just suddenly stop working against you, and they learn to move on.
Speaking of "round like a record baby", have you seen this compilation of sudden deaths happening in the past 2 years? Warning: It's funny but in a disturbing way.
That train one is horible isn't it? Scary stuff
OK, ive just done two mutes, and holy cow this post looks different... probably should have done that long ago!
Nice. I really like how the mute feature works on Blurt (which is also how it works on Steem and Hive). Discreet but very powerful.
And yeah, this comment section is a lot easier to handle now! Shines up like a new penny.
I have a strange double standard...on Bastyon I have 142 accounts muted, but on Blurt none!
Yes, i just might have to do my first one! Possibly it won't be the one you are thinking of, but it will be the one that is boggling my mind...
(
Why the big difference? On Blurt I only look at the feed of all the accounts I follow, on Bastyon I see all the new posts minus all the accounts I have blocked. And I also block anyone who blocks me. And that is quite a few accounts for some strange reason...
It's as easy as disagreeing with megadrive or ctime. but the narrative is already boring, when you read the posts from July 7, you can tell they were just waiting for the regent account to expire for them to take over, but they couldn't because the Hardfork divided the voting power, and this is divided by the amount of witnesses, and from there the only thing that is alleged is that they can't use that money. Who tells ctime how to use their money? I would say that having 14 million blurt the (50k) mmm (3 million blurt__) should be supporting what is being done to precisely get out of the minimum price that exists and so that those who call themselves investors multiply their money, just like you and me.
but they are not going to do it, because they got their asses kicked and here they could not take control, not even using the double u puppet.
This tech stuff is all way over my head and i dont have any insider info, but i will support anyone who posts good content or has creative ideas.
And from now on i will just ignore anyone who i think is full of shit. I didn't used to, but now i get that thing about morons dragging you down to their level and beating you with experience
Love that song bro... Where did you get that band?
You!
Hehe😜🤙
Congratulations!
You have recieved a coconutty upvote! 🥥
Thank you for contributing to the Blurt Blockchain!
Keep up the great work!
Curated by @outofthematrix!
Please take a moment to vote for my witness! 🗳️ https://blurtwallet.com/~witnesses?highlight=outofthematrix
👀
At this point I can only say that @world-travel-pro true face shows, being one of the biggest hypocrites on the platform. I wonder why he doesn't give his own keys to you? why ctime if he has a healing bot he doesn't give it to others? is it because that is the right and property of every single person on this platform?
it is notorious that what is always wanted to sell here, that others deliver what they have generated only for third parties can take control by selling a false narrative.
An easy to see example of this is that the Blockchain, the core of it is accessible to anyone and that is not an impediment to develop or promote what you want, but the reality is that it is not what you want, you just want to take control but without making efforts.
lol
because they thought they could do the same as upvu did with steemit, by means of vote proxies they wanted to control the witnesses, and as this was not the case as Double did shit at the time, they wanted to press with the token, massive sales and others.
What is not said, is that since the arrival of Blurt buyers who have not contributed anything to the blockchain, their desire to control the chain was obfuscated and diminished to the point that they are invisible to the community in general, they are not leaders, and do not support anything that develops so far. Surprisingly, while some only want the voting power that prevents them from controlling the chain to be eliminated, today the foundation or core team or whatever you want to call it has these developments
Investors
Clone a repository
While you say you are just stealing, everyone is quietly working for a better future, with you or without you. Because the way to kick them out of their ass is by developing, betting on improving many things. But it is notorious that perro sin bolas (mmkkkk) and ctshit only wanted to impose themselves to gain control of the platform, but they found the star, that nobody supports them.
ctime and mmmk aka dog without balls have 17 mollions of Blurt, be the example start burning a million at least, be the example for the community to follow.
I am muting you, troll. I have enough commentary here without having to reply to your endless spam and trolling. You can reply, but I'll never see it.
troll666 ,.. 666 the mark of the beast ,.. the mark of marks ,.. themarkymark .
He won't even deny it if asked , won't confirm it either , but i know enough .
This troll only wants to mess things up on blurt ,. your decision to mute is legit .
Hmm, thanks, I hadn't noticed the connection between 666 and "themark". Not that it matters who is behind the account, it's clearly just here to distract and upset.