Interesting publication, everything you say is true, about the founders and that the platform has many problems to solve, I was thinking that why do you want a business if you don't help it grow, because I don't see any interest. I have written ideas about Blurt, publicizing the platform, trying to push them to change the mindset and add Blurt to more exchanges, that's exposure and more people would join the platform, but they don't seem to care, they just do the blind They don't understand one thing, if you don't invest in your business, you will never grow. We are a community, where many people share ideas and content and it is better to generate wealth for everyone, that is the key, because not only they would win, everyone here would win. I also have a @team-mexico project on the platform for two years trying to build a community, trying to manually curate the content, but it's a lot of work and they don't turn around to see the effort one makes for the platform. Every day I try to get attention to get support and keep curating more content but it seems to no avail, only a few people have believed in me and I thank you for your support. In any case, with or without support, I will continue to do what I love and make Blurt grow. Just like you, we need more people who speak for the good of the community, people with values, who are aware and who seek the good for all, in this way wealth will grow for all, that is why we are here. And in the same way I think that the community must solve this problem of abuse, it is the only way that Blurt is going to be successful. We also need another bull market, but first we need to solve all the problems that plague us. I would be very grateful if you can help team-mexico a little, to curate more content.
RE: Fixing Blurt so we ALL prosper
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Fixing Blurt so we ALL prosper
Help grow and how do you do that?
More trades equals more transactions. for that more users
For more exchanges, it is first necessary to be attractive to more users.
It is easy to say that the problem is the developers and founders, when there is an open war to take control of the platform.
Why don't you ask for a consensus to exist between both parties in order to move forward?
Why should we tell a person what to do with their funds?
What if I tell you that you can't use your token to create a healing bot? ctime if you can? mega drive right?
You see the example of double standards.
The problem is not only to say that there is a low price, you have to see from when all this conflict originates
I remember when Double U said openly that he would start power down and send the price to hell, then Ctime and dog without balls said openly if they don't let us have control or eliminate this we will sell everything.
Guess who writes this comment? to the same ones who said they would sell everything.
Can I trust your name? Troll666, that doesn't look very reliable for a person who wants to give valid arguments. It's just that I don't understand the point of wanting to control the platform, because, unless they want to make it grow, I really don't understand why someone would want control of Blurt, the objective of Blurt is not that, the objective of Blurt is to grow the entire community, attract more people to publish interesting content, more services must be created and solid foundations created to make the platform attractive, among them, as you say, bring more people, but how do you do that, if people do not understand what Blurt is And in addition to that, you do not help him, a type of academy for new users must be created, with the publication of interesting guides. I don't know if you understood the point of the post, which is to raise awareness for the founders to do things right, they know what Blurt needs, but they don't do it or don't want to do it, because they only want revenue for themselves, no one else. This is a community and the platform should be attractive to everyone and help make life better for others, everyone equally or at least that the platform comes close to this point. That point is also important, an agreement between both parties, better because not everyone should get to work for the good of Blurt, not just one party or two, everyone has different ways of thinking and you will never agree with everyone, so stop playing blind and when you really support the platform that day will come a change and we will see that Blurt will be a success. At this point if no one cares about Blurt, we will never grow, why don't you invest in your business and shut the mouths of many people, because you don't do things right, communication, updates, support in votes to all kinds of people, create a dynamic to attract more developers, but they don't want to pay them, it's that easy, you really don't see that they want to make Blurt grow. Until when are they going to work in a real way for the community. I wonder, there are many ways to grow Blurt.
Speaking of curation bots, why do I want a bot, get to work, do things on your own merit, why do I want a bot that does not interact with the community. Do not know how much time curators invest in the community, do not know that a person invests many hours creating a publication, we must all work together with Blurt, curators, content creators, communities, developers, witnesses, founders. It is the only way we are going to get real interaction. We must value the work that all the people in Blurt do, we are all important, we must create wealth for everyone, we must work as a team, stop fighting like children, please, stop wasting your energy on something that is not good, start doing something productive and for the first time do something good for the community. Everyone is free to do what they want with their participation, because they invested time, money and effort and if it is no longer convenient, do what you want with your participation in the platform. I am not going to fight with that person, because he turned off his Blurt, he does it for a reason, as I said before, we must create wealth for everyone, equally. There are millions of people in the world that will see all the good in the platform, let's stop questioning and judging what a person does with his participation. Reach out to new people. I don't know who you are and I share my opinion with a lot of respect, I'm sick of it always being the same, from steemit, hive and now blurt. We have to change that. If you want to keep fighting do it, if you want to focus on changing the path of the platform do it, everyone do what you want, that's what the platform is about, freedom of expression, focus on growing the platform, focus on generating wealth for others. Nice day. ✨💕
What's stopping you from creating something for the platform? a frontend? a new wallet? a new application? new dapps?
Nobody is stopping the users. What I want to make you understand is that there are arguments that are issued with a double standard and I can expose them without being someone rude, which has nothing to do with the name. you trust a name MMMKKKKKK and not a troll? do you understand the point? or should I explain it?
Arguments:
there is an open war between ctime and mmk to control the blockchain, how do they wish to do this. Through the witnesses, at one point their voting power was centralized and they wanted to be able to remove and put witnesses that were only aligned with their thoughts, to sure anyone will tell me that megadrive does the same, in reality it happens in any graphene and cosmos blockchain. who has more voting power can choose or move their witnesses.
beyond being able to choose the witnesses, this group that you call investors I call them buyers of Blurt, they did not receive support from any of the witnesses, they wanted to make a forced acquisition claiming that the regent account was illegal but it was something that existed since the creation of blurt and is designed precisely to avoid these acquisitions.
based on the above then changed the dynamic to say that the airdrop of the founders, is not valid to what Mr. dog without balls called print stake, but look how it is ironic that in all blockchains there are these initial funds, even the same created bitcoin satoshi nakamoto has its initial funds that were never claimed, therefore it is a lie to say that you can not have initial funds, airdrop or other.
Is there an open war or not? do they want to manipulate those who make life in Blurt or not?
I find your point of view interesting, so keep on being the example. keep up the work you do. at some point you will get the rewards you deserve.
but one thing i am sure of, the developers will bring better innovations and there will be better incentives, but no thanks to no-ball dog and ctshit. by the way here is a kind message of how they wanted to manipulate the witnesses at that time.
My point about the curators is simple, I'm trying to say that people spend a lot of time on the platform and that wealth should be generated for everyone. The platform would be different if we all work together, real work.
I like how you avoid his points and instead try to create the narrative of what blurt is, as if its not what the funders wanted, and you essentially call the funders scammers, liars etc, which not only harm's the platform but you offer nothing of substance to show how and why it's a scam, which brings up the first question, why are you here if you think the people who run it, are so corrupt?
You make good points. Thanks for your support, and for doing what you can to build up this platform.
#letsgrowblurt
Thank you very much for bringing important topics like this to the table, for your dedication and commitment. You hit the nail on the head, congratulations for bringing such interesting content to the platform. I really admire your content, let's grow Blurt.
If you don't believe in the team behind Blurt, why are you still here? Why not fork it, as they did, and run your own, especially when you whine about the work you put in, so much work and no fucks given, but you persist in growing a place that you say doesn't care about you?