If you make a project available to the public under a Free and Open Source license you are agreeing to its public use by others. This is why Blurt exists, which is a fork of Steem. Dan Larimer, when writing Steem, wrote an agreement (a license) that anyone can use the project and develop it as they wish.
If you make a project available to the public under a Free and Open Source license you are agreeing to its public use by others. This is why Blurt exists, which is a fork of Steem. Dan Larimer, when writing Steem, wrote an agreement (a license) that anyone can use the project and develop it as they wish.
Where is Dan Larimer ?
Now I think he's developing EOS, but beyond that - I don't know.
Go there then.
So are you admitting that Blurt is centralized? I can see for myself that you would like to have power over users.
Yes. I think that everything needs some form of central governance … anarchy does not work. Period.
As cryptodrive has shown, central government is worse than anarchy.
Really ?
Show me one example of a successful “Anarchist community”
Just one. Only one. Just one example.