If you make a project available to the public under a Free and Open Source license you are agreeing to its public use by others. This is why Blurt exists, which is a fork of Steem. Dan Larimer, when writing Steem, wrote an agreement (a license) that anyone can use the project and develop it as they wish.
And what about all the original developers ?
Dissolve them. ?
Kind of like a parasitoid ?
If you make a project available to the public under a Free and Open Source license you are agreeing to its public use by others. This is why Blurt exists, which is a fork of Steem. Dan Larimer, when writing Steem, wrote an agreement (a license) that anyone can use the project and develop it as they wish.
Where is Dan Larimer ?
Now I think he's developing EOS, but beyond that - I don't know.
Go there then.
So are you admitting that Blurt is centralized? I can see for myself that you would like to have power over users.
Yes. I think that everything needs some form of central governance … anarchy does not work. Period.
As cryptodrive has shown, central government is worse than anarchy.