Hive is deep state funded, as was steemit...they can manipulate the prices as part of the experiment.
If Blurt is not deep state funded it is unlikly to ever go bigtime. I actually think that is a plus and have lost all interest in the value of the tokens. This is like monopoly money in a blogging game
Do you believe something that isn't funded by deep state can't do well organically (on its own)?
Or that it could, but the deep state would take actions to knock it back down?
I think the deep state controls social media, and can both grow and restrict platforms as required...in fact i think the cia has an entire division dedicated to that, and when they want the price to go up it does. At this point Blurt is of no importance to them so we can have our own little platform. But the chances of them spiking the price is very slim, and organically it is unlikely to do much... it might double i guess. The small time corruption of certain insider's doesnt help.
Yeah, but to answer my questions..?
Specifically social media...no i dont think any platform has become mainstream on it's own, all the big ones are deep state, and certainly if one got bigger than desired it would be taken down.
My question is: Do you believe something that isn't funded by deep state can't do well organically (on its own)? Or do you believe it could, but the deep state would then take actions to knock it back down?
I realize social media like FB and YT are manipulated by the deep state. Those platforms are PART of the deep state, as far as I'm concerned. I don't think Blurt is in that category. I'm trying to understand where you're coming from ("it is unlikely to ever go bigtime"), but you won't clarify your position, so.... shrug
My position
It is unlikely to ever go bigtime...if it is not a deep state platform it it will never reach the size of steemit or hivemind which are both cia
That is pretty clear isnt it?
No. My 2 part question wasn't open ended, nor was it a trick question, nor was it rhetorical. It was "yes" or "no". Very strange that you won't answer. Take care.
In theory, yes something could go up organically, but in practise, NO, it never happens, as pretty much every person and every platform that is popular in mainstream society has been put there. If you have any exceptions please name them because im researching this for a blog post and its starting to freak me out!
I think MySpace was organic no? It had its time lol
I think it is of some important tho. I think all of these are more social experiments than money. Hive was clearly a sort of 1984 style test to see how much people would tolerate in return for being given some little breadcrumbs and handouts for it. They rise some ppl up and pay them more to see if they would turn on their own people etc. I think blurt is interesting to them too tho as it’s an experiment into how a society copes with free speech and at least more freedom
Than they have on other social platforms they will be interested to watch it for sure. How we build social structures etc etc how we respect free speech. It’s still a useful observation platform.
I've been thinking this as well... ;)
Yes I absolutely believe this hive has enough access to enough money they can do anything they want to hold it up.
I think seeing it as a money making thing is not good. A handful of ppl earned big but let’s be honest most ppl if they spent 5 years investing that time in a business would have more money lol I think it has to be considered as a form of social media rly or an investment to just buy low and leave it be.