RE: It is realistic to imagine BLURT rising by x1000 from the current price
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It is realistic to imagine BLURT rising by x1000 from the current price
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Specifically social media...no i dont think any platform has become mainstream on it's own, all the big ones are deep state, and certainly if one got bigger than desired it would be taken down.
My question is: Do you believe something that isn't funded by deep state can't do well organically (on its own)? Or do you believe it could, but the deep state would then take actions to knock it back down?
I realize social media like FB and YT are manipulated by the deep state. Those platforms are PART of the deep state, as far as I'm concerned. I don't think Blurt is in that category. I'm trying to understand where you're coming from ("it is unlikely to ever go bigtime"), but you won't clarify your position, so.... shrug
My position
It is unlikely to ever go bigtime...if it is not a deep state platform it it will never reach the size of steemit or hivemind which are both cia
That is pretty clear isnt it?
No. My 2 part question wasn't open ended, nor was it a trick question, nor was it rhetorical. It was "yes" or "no". Very strange that you won't answer. Take care.
In theory, yes something could go up organically, but in practise, NO, it never happens, as pretty much every person and every platform that is popular in mainstream society has been put there. If you have any exceptions please name them because im researching this for a blog post and its starting to freak me out!
Sounds like you believe "it's a big club, and we aint in it" - George Carlin. I'm with you on that, I'm just not sure the maxim extends to Blurt. And I'm also not sure how it ever could. Although if you see my latest post, I'm calling out the management and insiders for corruption and cronyism, after doing some looking around at names and numbers today. I don't think this is a deep state problem, more of a "I want money and have to keep you from getting money so I can get more for myself" issue. But maybe there's a way it could morph into a deep state / elite issue, should the management/insiders get bought out. One thing that irked me when I first signed up here, I saw Megalomaniac say "we have to get all those anarchists off Blurt". I don't know if he doesn't really know what that word means, or if he's serious and against true freedom and decentralization.
I don't know Khrom well, but he's now the #1 witness here, and as far as I know, he is not an insider. He got there mainly because there's a large Polish community here that banded together and voted for him. We'll see what happens I guess.
FULLY AGREE,
GREAT POST YOU JUST DID
I think MySpace was organic no? It had its time lol