Well this was unexpected.
You create proposal, get funded no issue.
Khrom create two proposals, get funded no issue.
Nalexdre create proposal and get funded no issue.
When I create proposal all issues and your cry started.
At this point I don't feel like arguing with you. Please continue with whatever information you spread.
I don't need to justify what I do or not because everything is on chain with updates on what I do.
Also for Gitlab contribution you will not find there anything as that are official repos. I am not working with team, so can't work on those repos.
I have my own code, my own docker images and other code. I was already doing things before even the proposal and I don't feel like justifying to anyone specially you.
In any way, I am not affiliated with team and only working with personal capacity. And this is how everyone does, by creating a proposal and funded.
So i don't care if you are happy or sad, it is what it is.
Also for Serey, Yes I worked with them for some time, but stopped long back.
I am still there as a blogger, witness as on other platforms as well. I am not capable to support all with development, so I am doing whatever I can instead of that.
And by saying, this you are trying to control me by forcing community to go against me.
This is actually bad, but I will not say anything.
Enjoy and good luck with your plans.
If you are working privately on projects, doing it with your own money then ok.
If you did something with other people's money (i.e. from the Foundation / DAO) then it is worthwhile and even necessary to control and evaluate it. This is the standard of probably all civilised countries and I doubt it would be different in India. Especially when Blurt is doing poorly.
I was not aware that you had left Blurt Core, so your proposal is at least partly - justified. Partly, because you get resources for witnesses, so I don't know if you should get resources a second time from the proposal.
You as well getting from witness so why asking again.
I already justified costs in the proposal post.
I am not even taking half of the calculations.
I don't need to justify you or give proof.
You all just showed who is blocking development.
The community only will decide now.
@Fervi: You said " Partly, because you get resources for witnesses, so I don't know if you should get resources a second time from the proposal."
This made me laugh. Buddy you are one of the top 20 witnesses and you get the same amount of witness rewards as Tekraze. How come it's okay for you to get funded from DAO and not okay for Tekraze to get it.
@fervi might think that I have hacked blurt somehow and getting rich. But his statement Blurt doing poor only comes when I am asking for funding.
How sarcastic, that I who have been doing development for a long time, maintenance tasks, support, and as well supported, latam, live frontends, and now being questioned.
But by whom, the one who himself has created a proposal and earning, and that too the case that, blurt does not get affected with him getting.
This is more of a centralized approach by top witness asking other witness to justify.
@fervi even the latam code you are running on frontend was fixed and maintained by me. Adding some changes, does not mean you only have contributed everything.
That's right, BlurtLatam used to be developed by you. If you had continued to develop this project then I wouldn't have to.
I cannot ban you from anything. If you think you want a proposal, you have one. On the other hand, I hope, by analogy, that you will not take funds from the Blurt Foundation in the future for the same purpose.
Of course. Anyone who accepts funds should answer questions. That's the norm and that's the idea behind DAO. Users hire people to develop the project and they pay for it. And that should apply to everyone, including me.
There is a misinterpretation here,
Blurtlatam was strongly supported by Tekraze, but it was not owned by them, it did not manage the servers or the rpc. While it is true I am grateful for what we built at some point. Maintaining this portal with own resources became unsustainable. So it wasn't up to tekraze whether it would stay up or not.
Additionally there was always a paranoia of a guy here, that every time the server had a bug, he wrote some interesting conspiracy posts that had nothing to do with the case.
If you want more information about it, in my blog you can find information about why I didn't continue with the development of this frontend.
Only If you hadnt made the original team to go away with your behaviour.
You are not the authority to ask any question or even make false accusations. I can also ask the same to you.
And this is not a company where any user hires, its the people who their own want to support the project. But it does not mean one should work out of his own pocket.
Would you dare to do same ?
Hm
For a long time I worked for free for Blurt. Even despite accusations of account theft, which I was able to do with BlurtLatam, BlurtCreator and other projects.
On the other hand, you misunderstand the idea of a DAO. A DAO works like an organisation and that is the premise. It strives to be as efficient as possible.
I never said that people should work for free; on the contrary, they should earn, and as much as possible. However, if they want to earn, they should work. That is not communism.
I think I have to lecture you on the basics of decentralised organisations.
You should first follow these yourself. You cant police someone when you are yourself stealing. I don't want to hear any lessons from you. Just stop attacking me and spreading misinformation.
Otherwise you will be just giving me reason to file a defamation case and with proofs
We have all worked on blurt in our own way, with our own funds.
I wouldn't say you stole anything from blurtlatam, but from tekraze yes , the source code is free but you should at least mention the people who worked on it, but at least the decency to change the logo would have been something I would have appreciated, the name at least.
when there is a new blurt logo, I will change it.
Just for the record. There is a Blurtlatam healing account, which is not associated with this copy made by fervi and they use the same logo, because they only copied the source code, but didn't even have the decency to change it.
Ohhh, and if you are a witness, and you are in the top 20, why are you receiving funding from a proposal that you happened to be approved for in a comment below?
I think it's normal to criticize everyone. If you don't like my designs, go ahead.
Having a witness node allows you to pay for the server and minor expenses.
However, the proposal assumes much more projects. I don't know if they will. You probably don't remember, but on steem, together with a friend, we probably made the first game that attracted over 1000 people. We also plan to make an MMORPG for blurt. If you think nothing will come of it and it's a waste of time, you should write about it. Of course, other projects are also being created, BlurtSQL is synchronizing, and the next generation of Crossposter will be finished soon and we will see if time and money have been wasted.
Criticise?
You are shooting yourself in the foot by making the claim against tekraze. By saying that because he is a witness he should not have a proposal. Surprise you are a witness and he has a proposal. What is the play called the double standard?
I don't think you have understood that I am not criticising anything you have done, nor your design, nor your coding, I am reaffirming your own words.
Now if I must make some particular mention of all that you have just mentioned,
I hope it's not just stealing code from other programmers, and passing it off as your own, or claiming that you have implemented it yourself, without giving credit, as you have done previously here on Blurt.
I did not write that as a witness he should not have a proposal, but he should not have a proposal to be a witness.
The money from the proposal should go to projects other than witnessing.
Witnessing (network security, servers, etc.) is paid well enough not to subsidise the business.
The proposal is for development and upkeep of Blurt.one. He isn't asking funds to be a witness but to run a while lot of things.
Any honest person would have edited this post and clarified. I expect you to apologise to Tekraze for spreading misinformation about him and his project.
I would be happy to see and support if he actually wants to develop blurt.one.
He has already developed Blurtlatam which you now run. He has developed Blurt live which I was running. He has developed a few tools and has an impressive portfolio.
As of now you can just edit this post and share the truth.