That's right, BlurtLatam used to be developed by you. If you had continued to develop this project then I wouldn't have to.
Only If you hadnt made the original team to go away with your behaviour.
Of course. Anyone who accepts funds should answer questions. That's the norm and that's the idea behind DAO. Users hire people to develop the project and they pay for it. And that should apply to everyone, including me.
You are not the authority to ask any question or even make false accusations. I can also ask the same to you.
And this is not a company where any user hires, its the people who their own want to support the project. But it does not mean one should work out of his own pocket.
Would you dare to do same ?
Hm
For a long time I worked for free for Blurt. Even despite accusations of account theft, which I was able to do with BlurtLatam, BlurtCreator and other projects.
On the other hand, you misunderstand the idea of a DAO. A DAO works like an organisation and that is the premise. It strives to be as efficient as possible.
I never said that people should work for free; on the contrary, they should earn, and as much as possible. However, if they want to earn, they should work. That is not communism.
I think I have to lecture you on the basics of decentralised organisations.
You should first follow these yourself. You cant police someone when you are yourself stealing. I don't want to hear any lessons from you. Just stop attacking me and spreading misinformation.
Otherwise you will be just giving me reason to file a defamation case and with proofs
We have all worked on blurt in our own way, with our own funds.
I wouldn't say you stole anything from blurtlatam, but from tekraze yes , the source code is free but you should at least mention the people who worked on it, but at least the decency to change the logo would have been something I would have appreciated, the name at least.
when there is a new blurt logo, I will change it.
Just for the record. There is a Blurtlatam healing account, which is not associated with this copy made by fervi and they use the same logo, because they only copied the source code, but didn't even have the decency to change it.