Ohhh, and if you are a witness, and you are in the top 20, why are you receiving funding from a proposal that you happened to be approved for in a comment below?
RE: Do we really need the Blurt Foundation?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Do we really need the Blurt Foundation?
I think it's normal to criticize everyone. If you don't like my designs, go ahead.
Having a witness node allows you to pay for the server and minor expenses.
However, the proposal assumes much more projects. I don't know if they will. You probably don't remember, but on steem, together with a friend, we probably made the first game that attracted over 1000 people. We also plan to make an MMORPG for blurt. If you think nothing will come of it and it's a waste of time, you should write about it. Of course, other projects are also being created, BlurtSQL is synchronizing, and the next generation of Crossposter will be finished soon and we will see if time and money have been wasted.
Criticise?
You are shooting yourself in the foot by making the claim against tekraze. By saying that because he is a witness he should not have a proposal. Surprise you are a witness and he has a proposal. What is the play called the double standard?
I don't think you have understood that I am not criticising anything you have done, nor your design, nor your coding, I am reaffirming your own words.
Now if I must make some particular mention of all that you have just mentioned,
I hope it's not just stealing code from other programmers, and passing it off as your own, or claiming that you have implemented it yourself, without giving credit, as you have done previously here on Blurt.
I did not write that as a witness he should not have a proposal, but he should not have a proposal to be a witness.
The money from the proposal should go to projects other than witnessing.
Witnessing (network security, servers, etc.) is paid well enough not to subsidise the business.
The proposal is for development and upkeep of Blurt.one. He isn't asking funds to be a witness but to run a while lot of things.
Any honest person would have edited this post and clarified. I expect you to apologise to Tekraze for spreading misinformation about him and his project.
I would be happy to see and support if he actually wants to develop blurt.one.
He has already developed Blurtlatam which you now run. He has developed Blurt live which I was running. He has developed a few tools and has an impressive portfolio.
Of course, but at the same time he abandoned BlurtLatam, so I had to correct the code myself. There have been no changes in Blurt for half a year, where he was one of the main programmers.
Maybe the break from Blurt has done him good and we'll see rapid growth, or maybe not. I'd love to see how it will be
He worked on Blurt until the last day he was part of the team.
He stopped working on Blurtlatam because the team that was running it wanted to stop the front-end.
When are you going to post an apology for sharing lies about him? Any honest man would have already edited and clarified by now.
As of now you can just edit this post and share the truth.