Blurt and Decentralisation

I was watching this video by @famigliacurione and it bought up some thoughts for me regarding centralisation.

I have thought for a while now that these platforms can be whatever they want but at the end of the day it's the people themselves that have to make something decentralised, people can somehow centralise everything if they wish to and it's really the lower dimensional humans constant desire to stay in control/ retain control. This can be obvious and it can also be more subtle, but unless people have really done a LOT of self work and learnt how to live in a state of surrender, they will be terrified by dropping the illusion of control and power to protect themselves. You can even see this in relationship dynamics where people will chase or pull back in order to stay in control of their experience. The good old attachment/ avoidant dynamic that I have researched a LOT. Well this duality plays out everywhere till we learn to transcend it.

Blurt is kind of allowing humans to really behave as they want for the most part and allow them to re define how to act within the new society, without being told, but rather coming to some kind of consensus that means you get votes/ money / followers/ can survive within the society. Hive was very clearly just a rerun of the bigger world, which I could see pretty much immediately from joining steemit, it has all these promises of being decentralised but it was obvious from day one it had zero decentralisation and is just a small version of the world. Blurt is new though ,this allows us to define our own rules as a society here. There still are some unspoken rules however, of people putting their own ideas on what is 'correct' behaviour onto others. The difference here though is that they can only not vote they cannot actually punish someone else for not living to their ideals/ standards. Blurt also makes people take responsibility for their own behaviour, it's like small scale seeing how a world would be without police and jails and requiring people to actually engage in a healthy society without being told what to do. People kind of have to individually want to be and understand what decentralisation is for it to be, a platform is not enough, I have always felt that.

I am actually pretty impressed with blurt so far because although of course some centralisation exists at this time it is a small glimpse into living in a society without forced rules or punishments for not following rules and I actually think it makes people on the most part behave better. There are some taking advantage but on the most part I see more giving people here than anywhere else, people are always supporting one another and I have seen healthier discussion here than anywhere else as people actually have to debate and discuss they can't just tell them to F off and downvote them / throw them in jail. I wonder if all these platforms are just set up by the CIA to see how humans behave in various societies lol. As long as they pay me I am down for it, I never really got behind the others so I'm still waiting for my decent payout when blurt goes to the moon :D