so you have to be "less-free" in order to be "more-free" ?
how do you thread that needle ?
RE: If I Was Still On Hive
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If I Was Still On Hive
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Putting limits on the market share one entity can exert is not making anyone less free. Consider it a tax, that's what it represents and that's how it behaves. You can enjoy the free market, you just can't control it.
what if innovation creates a new market
how do you propose someone in government
control how popular a brand or product becomes ?
By how much it controls. If it cannot exercise control then it's irrelevant how much market share they have. What is your major issue with denouncing such immoral and unjust Subjugation by control over an entire market sector? Do you truly believe that monopolies are Victimized, like you argue?
i've never argued that "monopolies are Victimized"
that doesn't equal "monopolies are Victimized"
Yes it does, it seems you are concerned over poor monopolies, stop lying.
i'm interested in the question of when exactly and how exactly you believe a market should be policed
i'm interested in the question of when exactly and how exactly you believe a market should be policed