Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  

so you have to be "less-free" in order to be "more-free" ?

how do you thread that needle ?


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Putting limits on the market share one entity can exert is not making anyone less free. Consider it a tax, that's what it represents and that's how it behaves. You can enjoy the free market, you just can't control it.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

what if innovation creates a new market

how do you propose someone in government

control how popular a brand or product becomes ?


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

By how much it controls. If it cannot exercise control then it's irrelevant how much market share they have. What is your major issue with denouncing such immoral and unjust Subjugation by control over an entire market sector? Do you truly believe that monopolies are Victimized, like you argue?

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

i've never argued that "monopolies are Victimized"


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

you can't protect your personal idea of "free to trade"

without restricting the freedom of individual actors

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

that doesn't equal "monopolies are Victimized"


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Yes it does, it seems you are concerned over poor monopolies, stop lying.