RE: Rewards on Blurt: Request for Comment

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Rewards on Blurt: Request for Comment

in blurt •  4 years ago 

But I paid for it.

I think you still earn very well with your comment upvotes (you are the first upvoter most of the time), so I see no reason for complaining.

I upvote posts and comments with only few other upvotes in my insect community every day, and it's completely alright for me. The only thing which matters is a higer token value not a maximized curation reward.

And outside my pub, because of the curve, almost no strong stakeholder votes on the $0.16 contributions of my guests.

I regularly do that if I find the time to read through these comments. Of course I also upvote many other comments of small users, and I never regret it.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  4 years ago  ·   (edited)

... and it's completely alright for me.

For you.
For me and, I suppose, a lot of stakeholders and little accounts but not okay.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Yes, true, I wished more stakeholders would recognize, that in the long term it's worth to support small users (and also their comments) even if that means less curation rewards.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Unfortunately, your wish will not come true.

Therefore, we have to change the rules.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Ja, aber bezüglich des 'Wie' sind wir teils unterschiedlicher Meinung.

Ich halte eine Kombination aus

  • Flags,
  • Konvergent-linearer Kurve,
  • Diminishing-Returns,
  • Keinem oder sehr großem Kurations-Fenster

für am sinnvollsten.