... as example how upvoting comments can help newbies (where the convergent linear reward curve isn't a problem at all).
That makes me angry again. Cause you know me to tell you that it is a problem.
Since the implementation of the nonlinear curve, I've had to vote twice the percentage for my guests. That costs me a lot of money.
For my guests, I have compensated for the negative effect of the curve. But I paid for it.
And outside my pub, because of the curve, almost no strong stakeholder votes on the $0.16 contributions of my guests.
I think you still earn very well with your comment upvotes (you are the first upvoter most of the time), so I see no reason for complaining.
I upvote posts and comments with only few other upvotes in my insect community every day, and it's completely alright for me. The only thing which matters is a higer token value not a maximized curation reward.
I regularly do that if I find the time to read through these comments. Of course I also upvote many other comments of small users, and I never regret it.
For you.
For me and, I suppose, a lot of stakeholders and little accounts but not okay.
Yes, true, I wished more stakeholders would recognize, that in the long term it's worth to support small users (and also their comments) even if that means less curation rewards.
Unfortunately, your wish will not come true.
Therefore, we have to change the rules.
Ja, aber bezüglich des 'Wie' sind wir teils unterschiedlicher Meinung.
Ich halte eine Kombination aus
für am sinnvollsten.