So that means that your blogposts thrown in between basically have little meaning for you and comments on them steal your time, so they give you a sharper rebuttal? I figured you would be interested in statements differing from your view, that is the way of all spiritual quest. That is most likely why I tested the waters with you.

But if you post to simply post something, as a break filler between your picture-painting publications, a disclaimer under each text would be helpful, saying: "Acknowledgement welcome, challenges not". ... This joke was on you, I could not resist.

You could ask MD and the other witnesses if they might actually program the mentioned editor tools for the individual user blogs, because it would be quite useful, because you can then leave out the comment section altogether, for example. I would welcome that option on occasion, if I didn't have the nerve or the time to take care of the comments section.

Of course, then you wouldn't receive praise and affirming comments, would you? It would be interesting to find out if you can live without feedback. The explanations you write regarding "I don't want to give time to it and I don't want to go to war" rather give the opposite impression. With whomever you have had a tough disagreement of views, it is observable that you cannot tolerate well being at odds with someone and have to go on talking to someone other than them about their impertinences that you have been challenged with.

Why not admit that you also somehow enjoy it, there's nothing wrong with passing the time with people who really get on your nerves. It can benefit you big time!

Since you imply you want to train yourself spiritually (if you're really serious about it), the very best exercise would be to not put on mute the very people who get on your nerves the most.
It would be as if you wanted to give up sweets and, in order to test your limits and how far your spiritual maturity has come, you still put some in the cupboard for you to reach at any time. And whenever you get a craving for sweets, you could open the cupboard, look at the sweet things and then decide to close the cupboard doors again.

For my part, I can say that I find you very provocative. So you, because I have my own maturation processes going on, were my currently chosen nemesis on whom to test how good I am at letting go. You provide plenty of occasions to do this because you like to talk to third parties about those who challenged you. It's only that one does not see this in the moment it happens. Otherwise, if one would see it, there would be no conflict in the first place.

If it were easy to leave the sweets, then you wouldn't need spiritual training, then all beings would be friends. Since we are all sinners, it is impossible that all beings are friends at all times.

Anyway, I challenged you and you are by all means not someone who rejects it and likes to counter it. I didn't see it as a waste of time to mess with you. I learned that there are people who provide me with occasions where I lose what I think I have in terms of spiritual maturity very quickly and then I know for myself: HaHa! So there's your result, you now know that, as always, there's no end to this development (no point at which you've "made it", but any person, no matter where and no matter who, can catapult you to the beginning! There's something funny about saying it to yourself like that.

Then, the question arises: Is it really you personally (or me personally) who gives me/you a hard time? I'd say "no". For I have never met you, never got in a fleshy presence with you and all what you may stand for what I detected as "unpleasant" is to be found as well in myself.
Then, it is easy to let go.
Until the next occasion comes around the corner, even the same person. And so on and so forth.
One might also say that it's very heavy to take it easy. But once you take it easy it loses its weight. But in order to take a thing as easy, it had to be difficult. LOL