I have lived in the Whale and Self-Voter Jungle since I have been on the Steem and have never taken advantage of this opportunity for enrichment. Only once by accident. This is the way most people who still have honour and decency in their bodies practice it. In my opinion, such behavior destroys the social reputation of the user. Even if he was as highly regarded as you once were on the steem. But these are personal resentments, maybe even from far too moral wimps, which apparently play no role where the primary goal is to recapitalize his investment with the highest possible profit. But I thank you for dropping your pants so relentlessly against yourself.
RE: Rewards on Blurt: Request for Comment
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Rewards on Blurt: Request for Comment
There have always been hope and also some more or less successful actions against self-voting on STEEM. Here it is appreciated, here there aren't flags. That is the difference.
It is only a moral question, one of decency. After that you will be judged by a community and therefore I find it disappointing what you practice on the Blurt. I had a completely different image of you and therefore I really appreciated you. I'm sure you know that. Your self-votes even hurt a little bit now. You've changed and you're deliberately harming a hopeful project of idealists.
Not one of the Blurt activists ignores the constant abuse of the Blockchain. These are not people from another galaxy who have no idea what's going on. They'll shut down these self-service places eventually. But right now, they have a lot of construction sites to run and only one head and two hands. Don't be so bossy and impatient!
The opposite is the case: I show these idealists that they urgently should implement flags (or something with equivalent effect) again! Otherwise I simply cannot believe in (and waste time with) this project - there won't be any future!
History tells us that on blockchain what can be exploited and botted, will be exploited and botted. Even idealists should recognize that it's important to implement the necessary measures!
Think about this: I don't like @berniesanders, but with his spamming he is the reason why we are having transactions fees now (so in the end it was the best he could do).
NO, they appreciate it. Just read:
Here.
Here.
In Discord: "We want people voting for themselves on Zapata. I never understood why this behavior was so discouraged on Steem."
I already read the two comments yesterday, but I didn't really understood their meaning quite well. But it could be that I didn't want to understand it, because just at the moment my mouth would'nt get closed. I recommend to call your other friend on occasion. He is suffering and he can't do anything with cynicism. Bloggers are always just the fig leaf for the others
Ihr könnt die Leute auch direkt im Blurt-Discord ansprechen!
Ich habe @birdinc nun direkt und ganz deutlich gefragt und warte auf Antwort.
Du wirst keine bekommen oder nur Bla Bla lesen. Sie meinen, ohne die tolle Amortisationsshow des Missbrauchs, keine Investoren halten zu können.
I just commented to Jaki, before I had read your comment, how I understand the statements.
A note about your links:
I understand that quite differently.
The way I understand him, he considers it an effort when a user votes himself into the trending.
The fact that it is explicitly desired or that there is a request to vote for yourself, as you have said several times now, I can't read anywhere.
These two statements of @Birdinc are not clear enough to deduce that it is explicitly desired to vote yourself.
The other statement refers to ZAPATA.
Beantwortet an anderer Stelle.