If witnesses have no idea what exactly the HF includes...I find that troubling. I was under the impression that voting for witnesses was that they were in the "know". They had an understanding and and hopefully a say in what goes on behind the scenes. With that knowledge how can I trust what is taking place.
RE: #witnessdiscussion
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
#witnessdiscussion
Little problem friend.
there's like 50 people on earth who could audit blurt.
They can still ask questions before the fact and not after the fact, if you don't know ask, don't complain after.
I just love how all of a sudden those in power have an attitude change toward users. It is difficult to ask questions when it is not clear what is going on. Even one of your witnesses stated yesterday that at least some witnesses did not know all of what was in the HF (I am paraphrasing). I have seen many users confused as to what is going on. So the only way to grasp what has happen is after the fact.
The little I read prior to the HF was not clear. If you are going to use terms like "yield curve", and "front end" stuff, then someone needs to provide a clear operational definition of what they are talking about.
Such a drastic change from the beginnings of Blurt.