Everytime we Read a post about Reward Curve and how the rewards are calculated from @rycharde we smile and nod .
Like most users, we do not have a mathematics degree or anything comparable. A few graphics could bring a little more understanding.
if @rycharde says in 2 weeks the curve should be more normal again we believe him and are willing to wait this time.
A better communication would be awesome .As witnesses, we have to admit that we have no idea what exactly this hardfork includes.
All we know is that the display error is fixed and now the displayed post value should match the payout (after the 50/50 split).
But we don't know if the long awaited 25% Liquid Blurt payout is finally included.
If witnesses have no idea what exactly the HF includes...I find that troubling. I was under the impression that voting for witnesses was that they were in the "know". They had an understanding and and hopefully a say in what goes on behind the scenes. With that knowledge how can I trust what is taking place.
Little problem friend.
there's like 50 people on earth who could audit blurt.
They can still ask questions before the fact and not after the fact, if you don't know ask, don't complain after.
I just love how all of a sudden those in power have an attitude change toward users. It is difficult to ask questions when it is not clear what is going on. Even one of your witnesses stated yesterday that at least some witnesses did not know all of what was in the HF (I am paraphrasing). I have seen many users confused as to what is going on. So the only way to grasp what has happen is after the fact.
The little I read prior to the HF was not clear. If you are going to use terms like "yield curve", and "front end" stuff, then someone needs to provide a clear operational definition of what they are talking about.
Such a drastic change from the beginnings of Blurt.