"Russia cannot capture a small city-type village of Avdiivka with 10 thousand inhabitants in six months, having concentrated its main strike forces in this area, but you believe that it can capture a country of 40 million people?"

I don't believe anything. I'm telling you what I've observed. This is what people are saying, outside the lying Western mainstream media. It's not my belief, or my desire, it's just what appears to be happening.

As for Avdiivka, what makes you certain Russia is trying to capture it? What if, instead, they are trying (and succeeding) to waste most of Ukraine's available firepower and troops, in a "meat grinder" situation that costs Russia almost nothing? Perhaps they aren't in a hurry, as you seem to assume? I don't think you know and understand the objectives and tactics of the presidents and generals. They likely have a plan you're simply not aware of, leaving you to assume they are trying to capture Avdiivka, something you likely heard from the propagandists (state media outlets).

You are lost within the system itself. You are emotional and illogical. I am an outside observer. You think you are being objective, and that your "official" media sources aren't lying to you. That's your main mistake, and it will continue to cost you dearly.

"Russia suffered a defeat near Kiev and retreated."

That's a great example. Ukraine tells its people "we sent Russia home!", but the rest of the world knows that Russia never intended to destroy Kiev.

"Since then, the Ukrainian army has only become stronger, and the Russian army is much weaker."

Every side in every war in history tells their people that same thing. "We are getting stronger! The enemy is getting weaker!" It has no bearing on reality and means nothing. You repeating it will not change anything.

" Only with the arrival of the F-16 will we see some kind of radical change in the nature of battles."

Is that when Russia will start using more of its available capabilities and weapons that it has been withholding?