Hi @hugo1954, great news! Your content was selected by curators @ten-years-before, @nalexadre to receive a special curation from BeBlurt 🎉 Don't hesitate to upvote this comment as the curators will receive 80% of the rewards for their involvement.
You can support us by voting for our witness, our decentralized funding proposal, or through delegation. You're also welcome to join our Discord server 👉 https://discord.beblurt.com
*For a delegation of 45,000 BLURT 👉 https://beblurt.com/mydelegation/@beblurt
BeBlurt (Blurt frontend) 👉 https://beblurt.com
on IOS/Android 👉 https://beblurt.com/s/aMGBrg
Thank you for curating and supporting my content @beblurt.
What do you think of the initiative to burn the tokens in @null? I intend to write a post with arguments for and against
Regards @nalexadre & @beblurt team.
Hi @hugo1954, thanks for your nice post; it's always a pleasure to read :)
Regarding the initiative, the only positive aspect I see is that it brings animation to Blurt. However, for the goal it aims to achieve, it may not be effective. Firstly, only authors are impacted, as the burn is just adding @null as a beneficiary (curators aren't affected). Secondly, the volume burned remains small, as the exchange volume is still insufficient to have any significant impact on the price of Blurt.
In my opinion, the better approach is onboarding campaigns with gamification and incentives. Currently, I'm working on something related to this, and a post explaining how it works is currently in progress.