....replace 'money', with 'assets'.
'they' will ALWAYS defraud, rob, steal etc - the problem isn't erased with erasing money.
It is erased (or mitigated, it can never be erased), with a wide scale awareness of the psychologies at work.
I understand where you are coming from, but I think the focus (or solution) you see, is incorrect.
Um... Without money, why would anyOne break the three Laws of Ethics? Why would You defraud when You have all You want? Why would You rob, steal, torture, murder?
And if You are a psychopath (about 1% of Us) who gets off on hurting Others, You may do something unEthical, but You will only be a petty criminal and will receive Ethical consequences.
You will not be able to buy Your way out of any charges.
Such "crimes" will drop to statistically nil. I suggest that You do not see the whole picture...
This tells me you do not understand the basic psychological structure of psychopathy. (they _have no ethics!).
'They do it' - because they can.
I suggest you see the world from a utopian, and naive, perspective.
You do not grasp what psychopathy is.
Peace.
I think You're wrong. Firstly, I have studied psychopathy for 50+ years. Secondly, I fully grasp that many of Them would TRY to do ghastly things, but... Without money, how the hell can They attain widespread control?
Don't just cherry pick things to respond to. Answer that question.
Without money, how would the other 96%, transact?
Widespread control starts with local control, yes ? (it rhetorical).
Local control starts with the majority of a local population not understanding psychopathy, yes? (not rhetorical)
Ergo, education at the the local level, prevents any widespread control.
Simple.
And then money can keep being used for used, for the useful ftool it is.
Or are you thinking of there being some kind of utopian communism ? (good luck with that one - not rhetorical, sarcastic)
(and p.s the % is closer to 4, than 1, just saying - according to stats from hare, onwards...?)