Ok, maybe a few pages at a time. I also want to challenge myself and write for my own learning experience and not for anyone in particular. However, I did pick a book I though would be very interesting to read it all through. So I read the first few chapters to get a tase. If it gets me hooked I'll keep going.
I already did that which is why I want to do this publicly, because this book already spoke alot of truth of things I already have extensively researched.
I want to share thoughts and ideas and other things I have found along the way, and how this is related to BLURT as it currently is, but first we must dive into the cold ocean to understand and remember why we joined crypto in the first place. To stem away from fiat currency because if its
rashing value due to it being printed on thin air and bscked by nothing but debt. Most likely in seperate posts. We'll see how it goes as it unravels through.
///
People of the unfree world. We are not free. Since the stone ages, we have been enslaved into a system that has separated mankind into two categories.
The haves and the haves not.
The rich and the poor.
And it was the rich, who tricked the poor into defending the rich and keep the poor from taking back their liberties.
Granted it took the poor long-term to catch on to what was happening, because the rich used literature and words of art to keep the slaves from realizing they were slaves. Not many slaves knew how to write and read but that didn't stop them from having lots of common sense, more so then, than now, unfortunately.
///
Starting with the punchline:
Lending on interest is criminal
What is this trickery that has been pulled on everyone?
In this book it is called the sumarian swindle, imposed upon mankind by (some) "jews"(today THEY call themselves zionists) of today, and by the sumarians of then more than 7 thousand years ago.
Despite the amount of years it was ago, it was only just yesterday that mankind tripped and fell hard into this dirty scheme.
But how is it a scheme?
This book will repeat it but the idea is simple to understand.
When you lend something to someone, that is okay and natural thing to do.
Lending and paying back later is a natural phenomenon that humanity has always done.
What the difference with lending on interest is, is that it enables the lender to profit extremely, at the cost of the borrowers expense. Thus a theft has been committed at a large scale that will slowly leave the borrowers with nothing (today we call it bankruptcy).
Before the interest on loans was ever introduced, villagers would lend to their neighbors in time of need. In time of need, if you needed something, you go to your villagers and ask for it with promise to repay it later. That way, everyone thrived always.
Insects do this. The bees and ants were used as an example in this book and so will I.
Actually, observing ants is something, I think, everyone has done at some time, would you agree?
Have you ever noticed, ants, bees or any insect, give food to another by mouth? Regurgitating what they had eaten to provide nutrients to their tribe. Birds do this too sometimes. As it was said, lending or borrowing, is a natural phenomenon. None of them lend on interest.
They give. Expect nothing back because they can just borrow and give forward to another who is in need. It balences itself this way.
And the ant colony flourishes. All of nature flourishes this way. Trees, mushrooms, etc all plant life just gives. Even our own cells in our body, give give give for the greater good(you). It is only us humans, who act in such an anti natural way woth each other. Give and take more than what was given, leaving behind a forced way of living in eternal poverty.
Humans are selfish. But, is this a condition imposed upon us through natural events, or an indoctrination of having us believe we live in poverty for the sake of the jews (zionists, the elites).
Lending on interest, printing money out of thin air, taxing the interest, these things are anti human and anti nature. It is not a natural phenomenon. Is this why, our ancestors views themselves or their "gods"("Lords") as snake people?
INTRODUCTION
This book already made me chuckle with the first line and it's only the first paragraph.
Also I am not sure if the author is referring to all jews in general, or just those that called themselves jews and applied "the swindle" to the masses. I'll incline towards the latter either way, for now
Fyi, the intro is short, and so is chapter 1 and 2, after that it expands in length. So the rest of these posts will be broken into parts.
Let's continue...
The second paragraph details to an extent, what is going on with the Blurt foundation.
Making grandiose of non existent value.
Over and over again they paint blurt in pretty colors to supposedly attract newcomers.
For 1 of a few examples I can think of, claiming it is "family friendly", meaning it is safe for children. That is by far from reality and I opine their ethics and morals are broken down.
Never was social sites ever created FOR children. Children are not safe on the internet period thus parental supervision would be a must, especially on a blockchain where anything literally goes. This is a free for all environment, and although the front ends can filter out por and other bad stuff such as murder videos and pedophilia, on the chain, it remains forever. And children can still get caught in the mix of veiwing such things despite the efforts.
Blurt, hive and steemit are essentially for mature audiences only. (Notice i didn't add an age limit, but I would say 18+ if possible, but nothing done to enforce it with any vio|lence.
What do you have to deny it?
Another example is claiming to be social fairness, with no censorship or censorship resistent.
We have discussed this before many times in great detail and it has fallen on deaf ears. But if your one of the few who still has a skeptical mind set, then continue reading on.
In all of the front ends except for blurtlatam.intinte.org, the mute design for those front ends, are socialistic. It is designed in a way that public easement like a side walk is forbidden to speak freely.
What do I mean by this?
If I were to mute you, a function which will censor your writing from being seen by me alone. That is fine.
IE. Your ugly words are too much for me, so I mute you because of fragile egos and such. You are thus hidden to ME.
However, in the front ends, excluding blurtlatam.intinte.org, something sinister has been added to the mute function. A real karen move has been played.
Imagine excercising your free speech rights and some karen snowflake muzzles you and hides you from other public eyes. Would that seem fair?
But that is what happens on those front ends.
Blurt.blog
blurtone
Etc
Not blurtlatam.intinte.org (this is pretty much raw. You get to see it all.)
When you mute xyz and use those front ends, everyone else sho uses those front ends will not be able to see xyz comments in the comments section (ie. The sidewalk, the public domain), but they will still recieve a notification which adds to the irony.
Yea so what they gave you the power to shoot someone, but doesn't mean you should right?
Sure everyone can have power over others to some extent or another, but ethically speaking, is it right to do so?
Is it right to censore others for others?
If it's just for your own, that is fine, you can cover your eyes and eat sand, but you don't have the moral right to do it to others. And if you agree with that last statement, then consider using blurtlatam.intinte.org instead, or quit pretending to be for free speech and liberty.
"Making grandiose of value that doesn't exist"
Get paid for good content.
Really now? Is that a fact? For good content? Really?
I must be in the wrong arena then, but don't we see shitty content getting massive votes? Is it really good content they want, or content they only approve of?
Content @blurtbooster approves:
Pictures of pets, ai generated content, spam, plagiarism, posts of users who buy their votes through bots, anyone who follows the narrative and doesn't question it.
All automated.
I prefer organic votes over bots anyday.
Btw, Anyone ever read this?:
https://blurtlatam.intinte.org/@khrom/rrprsy
///
Who does @megadrive mute?
https://blurtblock.herokuapp.com/megadrive/
///
...
Back to the show...
If you wish to download these books in pdf, I have the first two volumes.
Shoot me an email here for a copy:
Or follow my blog as I cover this book, a few pages at a time.
And then there were the few societies that developed in abundance, where lending was pointless. Where no "money" - from trade/barter to electronic bits - arose. They had the caring Ones taking care of things, not the psychopaths controlling things. (Money systems WILL promote psychopaths to power.)
And We can build in that model today...but for the psychopaths who want to retain Their power/money. They hide the tech that would make it possible...
Wouldn't money without the current 'usury ethos', mitigate 95% of the problems that you see with money ?
Usury is a coerced wealth extraction, which then - inevitably, leads to control....
Not in the least. Psychopaths WILL defraud, steal, rob, torture and kill for money. They will eventually get the most. They will then buy up the schools, publishing, media, research facilities, governments, and more.
They will plot and plan the control of Us. No usury needed.
....replace 'money', with 'assets'.
'they' will ALWAYS defraud, rob, steal etc - the problem isn't erased with erasing money.
It is erased (or mitigated, it can never be erased), with a wide scale awareness of the psychologies at work.
I understand where you are coming from, but I think the focus (or solution) you see, is incorrect.
Um... Without money, why would anyOne break the three Laws of Ethics? Why would You defraud when You have all You want? Why would You rob, steal, torture, murder?
And if You are a psychopath (about 1% of Us) who gets off on hurting Others, You may do something unEthical, but You will only be a petty criminal and will receive Ethical consequences.
You will not be able to buy Your way out of any charges.
Such "crimes" will drop to statistically nil. I suggest that You do not see the whole picture...
This tells me you do not understand the basic psychological structure of psychopathy. (they _have no ethics!).
'They do it' - because they can.
I suggest you see the world from a utopian, and naive, perspective.
You do not grasp what psychopathy is.
Peace.
I think You're wrong. Firstly, I have studied psychopathy for 50+ years. Secondly, I fully grasp that many of Them would TRY to do ghastly things, but... Without money, how the hell can They attain widespread control?
Don't just cherry pick things to respond to. Answer that question.
Without money, how would the other 96%, transact?
Widespread control starts with local control, yes ? (it rhetorical).
Local control starts with the majority of a local population not understanding psychopathy, yes? (not rhetorical)
Ergo, education at the the local level, prevents any widespread control.
Simple.
And then money can keep being used for used, for the useful ftool it is.
Or are you thinking of there being some kind of utopian communism ? (good luck with that one - not rhetorical, sarcastic)
(and p.s the % is closer to 4, than 1, just saying - according to stats from hare, onwards...?)
Upvoted. Thank You for sending some of your rewards to @null. Read my last posts to make sure that BLURT burning is profitable for you. Before using this bot please make sure your account has at least 100 BP. Get more BLURT:
@ mariuszkarowski/how-to-get-automatic-upvote-from-my-accounts@ blurtbooster/blurt-booster-introduction-rules-and-guidelines-1699999662965@ nalexadre/blurt-nexus-creating-an-affiliate-account-1700008765859@ kryptodenno - win BLURT POWER delegation@ ctime/burn-bot-liquid-blurtUsury and greed.... indeed.
I must say, the list of who mutes you is a little disappointing...lololol
So if I tag @megadrive here, he will see this excellent post?
I wonder, when does plausible deniability start to look like sheer laziness, or a simple lack of interest in the platform itself (or intellectual cowardice) ?
....Alinsky turns in his grave, opens one decaying eye, and see's a feudalistic system of 'have's' to play with...
(the 'have's is only referring to some made up tokens and a delusion of power of course - so nothing of value).
....and then he croaks .... 'hold my beer'....
And all the C.U.N.T.'s groan 'You can't you Saul against us, he's on our side.'
At which point Saul turns one beady eye one them, and whispers, 'fuck you'...