hmmm....I have yet to see any tax upon peoples productivity (in the entirety of history, that I'm aware of), where it is viewed as 'adding new energy' - draining energy, yes, but adding ?... no).
... I'm also not aware that taxation of the productive (parasitical in nature), as ever being seen as 'a fun twist'... just sayin'
I agree, the price wont pump much because of this (all dependent on bitcoin, not blurt).
For the large accounts who use the platform as a financial product by buying/selling/arbitraging - it would make a considerable difference in the short term.
If this doesnt bring positivity , i will stop it and i am sure everyone else will too.
in some ways , burning tokens should be positive but not always , i agree.
oh, side question...
Would you be interested in doing some voice overs for me on something I'm working on?...We can work out some profit share/payment - if it's successful.
(french accents are always a good sell! lol)
Sure ! I would love it
Cool !
I can write the script/narratives, and then send to you - you do your voicy thing, and email the file back...
I will be a week or two as I have lots of things happening right now (mostly offline), and waiting for reply from a Ukrainian model for permission to use her images for the idea I have in mind.
Email:
[email protected]
(I won't be talking about this idea on blurt)
Ok perfect
It's not the burning of tokens that is the problem/issue.
It's the coercive nature of it. 'if you don't do this, then I won't give you that'...
(people naturally hate coercion and it acts, psychologically, as a disincentive to produce the very products that would attract more users...hmmm...).
I do like how Opidia is not asking creators to burn rewards , she as a curator only burns the rewards of these daily posts she makes . She still upvotes posts that do not burn . Fair and honest to me .
;-)