OK so solipsism is not a valid premise?
We can't even agree on what red is.
To verify, logically, we have to start with axioms. What are yours?
RE: I DESTROYED GPT4 and SOLVED PHILOSOFY
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I DESTROYED GPT4 and SOLVED PHILOSOFY
dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum
I love that!
I was going to bring up descartes and his failure to prove all things from one axiom.
So that's it? One (great) innovation on a washed up philosopher's most famous statement?
well, there are a lot more on top of that one
my own thoughts and senses are generally but not 100% reliable
it is often useful to imagine naive realism is valid, in order to reduce social friction
etcetera
idk what naive realism is, but I think I can see it all around me. And yes, those of us who do not engage in naive realism are seen as threats to the social order.
naive realism is the philosophy of people who say they don't have a philosophy
Trivium 🤬
and Quadrivium 🥓
i can see where you think you're going with this,
engineering is validation of objects
EVEN IFF you are currently hallucinating some sort of solipsistic fever dream
lol I hardly ever think I know where he is going, but I am always entertained.