RE: I DESTROYED GPT4 and SOLVED PHILOSOFY

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

I DESTROYED GPT4 and SOLVED PHILOSOFY

in ethics •  2 years ago 

I love that!

I was going to bring up descartes and his failure to prove all things from one axiom.

So that's it? One (great) innovation on a washed up philosopher's most famous statement?


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

ethics
2 years ago by
0.74 BLURT
  • Past Payouts 0.74 BLURT
  • - Author 0.37 BP
  • - Curators 0.37 BP
1 votes $0.00
3
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  2 years ago  ·  

    well, there are a lot more on top of that one

    my own thoughts and senses are generally but not 100% reliable

    it is often useful to imagine naive realism is valid, in order to reduce social friction

    etcetera

    Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

    0.00 BLURT
      $0.00
      [-]
        ·  2 years ago  ·  

      idk what naive realism is, but I think I can see it all around me. And yes, those of us who do not engage in naive realism are seen as threats to the social order.

      Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

      0.66 BLURT
      • Past Payouts 0.66 BLURT
      • - Author 0.33 BP
      • - Curators 0.33 BP
      1 votes      $0.00
      [-]
        ·  2 years ago  ·  

      naive realism is the philosophy of people who say they don't have a philosophy

      Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

      0.00 BLURT
        $0.00