(Just thought I would interject here.)
We also need to consider... the crypto tide is receding. Once value begins to flow back into the crypto sea all the fundamentals change.
There are seasons... and now is the time to invest in the future rather than expect the returns of summer.
We are here... and that means we have made the decision to go long on Blurt.
There are always going to be problems to solve... the bigger (more successful) the project the bigger the problems there will be to solve.
Rather than thinking Blurt is broken... we all need to remember the reasons why we first came here in the first place... and find vision/ways to build undeniable value around the platform we have chosen to establish ourselves on. (That's my point of reference anyways.)
Sincerely,
@wil.metcalfe
Comet Ranker
those are golden words. It is in this spirit that I try to act.
Despite being aware of the problem of blurt bososter. Here I will add from myself about the booster because you asked what it was about.
The problem is that it's the biggest force after upu. Unlike upu, the entire stake belongs to the founders and they have power over it, and in the case of upu, these are funds from the delegation. In the first case, only the founders earn money on the treatment, who by the way use this account to maintain power, regardless of whether others like their actions or not, which disturbs the assumptions of this blockchain as a place where we decide who creates it.
However, while it is still understandable, the biggest problem with this sum is that it was entirely printed by the regent's account, which was programmed to create these blurts out of nothing for 2 years. And here is the greatest risk:
These are mega-easy blurts for free that have a value in the pot that is almost equivalent to what all the rest have. In the event that they were paid out, for example, during some bull market in the future, they would reset the stock market, crashing the market and leaving people who invested here, huge money with nothing.
The more so that they are owned by the same people who are responsible for most of the infrastructure through which blurt works. Which in the case of the aforementioned action would practically bury this network at the moment and would not even give a chance for these investors to get back, for example, in the future.
Of course, it cannot be assumed that this is the intention of the creators, but also taking into account the numerous already famous scams on the crypto market, it is also not surprising that such "setting" raises anxiety, especially among investors such as mk and ctime who have the most to lose here.