Currently, inflation is 9.01%. If I am not wrong this number cannot go up. And now:
Vote Yield estimate (100k BP) = 19.7% APR (-0.3)
If all BLURT were powerd up and used to vote on posts, Vote Yield would be 9.01%
This is the conclusion: large accounts such as blurtbooster, ctime, upvu.... benefit from the fact that small accounts do not vote
This is why I think that an auto voting tool that works on the principles I mentioned is needed. It would allow for a fairer distribution of reward pool funds
https://blurtlatam.intinte.org/blurt/@rycharde/blurt-economic-indicators-20-november-2022
Ok, it's math and Tokenomics but I'm talking about other factors that I think are equally or even more important:
Creators of quality content don't care too much about 5-10 bucks per post. What they are interested in is, for example, 2,000 followers regularly visiting their blog every month, who take interactions to, for example, will buy the products they promote, click on their advertisement or leave feedback so that they can consume the attention of others. The best ones who keep following them earn a few thousand a month, although they write, for example, 5 - 10 articles.
These are the people we want to have because they will keep many of users on blurt who, apart from activity under their posts, will also be recipients of other services, and clients.
For me, the situation is simply that we want to cook dinner by burning down the kitchen.
On hive, the decrease in user activity was felt very strongly after the introduction of voting tails.
The second thing that discouraged users were, of course, downvotes, but I'm afraid that the lack of the first ones may not help much here.