Shameless character hidden behind the veil of shame.

The concept of an “indecent character cloaked behind the veil of disgrace” highlights an important mental and ethical duality, in which outward expressions of guilt or discretion conceal an inner rebellion or negligence. At first glance, this individual may appear to be bound by social desires, constrained by the usual standards of tolerance, repentance, or humility. Their surface personality is one of self-restraint, perhaps even self-censorship, conveying a hesitation to transgress or disrupt the ethical order. Be that as it may, beneath this façade lurks a deep-seated impropriety, a character that clings to misbehavior or the unthinkable but remains hidden from view.
source

This inner pressure poses a fascinating puzzle: they venture into disgrace not because they sense it, but as a defensive camouflage. The “veil of disgrace” is a veil of thought, a tool to avoid investigation or judgment. While society tends to compensate for remorse and self-regulation, this character uses these desires to their advantage, covering their genuine self with false humility. The open personality may be marked by downcast eyes, stifled tones, or open assertions of guilt, but the private reality is one of neglect, driven by a thirst for liberality, control, or rebellion.

source

Their indecency is not fundamentally established in a total rejection of deep quality, but in a complex relationship to it. They may receive the weight of social judgments, but choose to control the recognition of shame for personal gain or opportunity. The cloak protects them, not from the unforgiving decisions of others, but from having to confront their own inner chaos or desires.
source

The adequacy of this cloak often lies in the character's ability to act convincingly. The cautious execution of shame incapacitates others, creating an obstacle that anticipates further examination. In this sense, his wrongness is not an unmistakable transgression, but an imperceptible transgression: an inner resistance hidden beneath an outer similarity. In the end, the interplay between his covert wrongness and the obvious veil of disgrace characterizes the essence of his character, a movement between duplicity, guilt, and individual opportunity.