Extreme frustration in the media and cricket related people in the country's cricket and my thoughts!

What a shy state of cricket in the country! 3
In response to a question from a well-known TV channel of the country, Nannu Ashraful was re-introduced as a traitor and the manner in which he did counter question or counter attack deserves praise! 3

It is 100% true that Nannu must have insulted Mohammad Ashraful by calling him a traitor. Don't call it wrong; It's ridiculous! 3

But the counter question is - will we change the selection panel around the World Cup + the example of Australia's chief selector; I think he really gave the right answer!
Personally, I am the haters of Ashraful and Nannu! 3
But brother, good must say good, evil must say evil!

Ashraful's words about the election panel did not seem to me to be a person!

Person: In my opinion, the selection panel will be formed for a period of 4 years and then at the end of their term, the country's top cricket directors + presidents + senior cricket journalists will sit together and analyze the performance of the selection panel and decide whether they will continue or not.
Performance must be considered here!

The most interesting part is the work of the media!
Hopefully those who follow this report or program will understand!
Nannu was asked the question and what Nannu answered the question is a big issue brother!
Nannu is questioned about Nannu's personal achievements or imperfections; Then Nannu said let's add a little, then the word that Nannu said provoked was the headline of the news! 3

But what was supposed to happen?
Nannu was reported by Sami Bhai (the person asking the question) with the answer setuku! Isn't that so?

This video or report is a shining example of how the media can really influence a person in the minds of our general public.

! [Screenshot_20220104-114309.png] ()

. I am giving an example to everyone to watch the video very well a few times! Then you can understand everything! 3
In a comment made about Ashraful's selectors yesterday, Mr. Nannu has tried to keep his image right by washing him.

Asking Mr. Nannu here, he also mentioned the long term selector of Australia. And with this logic he wanted to explain that if Australia succeeds in keeping the selection panel in the long run, then why aren't we?

My deepest question to Mr. Nannu is that Australia has had some success with that long-term selection panel. But your panel has won a series or two by making a paddy field in Mirpur and after going out, please tell me what other records there are except for beating the box with the rest except Zimbabwe.

[So, before Mr. Nannu's question fell to the ground yesterday, it seems to me that it is premeditated to immediately answer the Australian issue. Because, from the total panel of BCB, everyone is beating the box. And the cricket-mad people are eating salt by putting plums on the heads of the people of this country .... This means eating plums without salt.

So, if anyone ever asks a question about this box hit, it is because according to their position, they are gathering a lot of logic and data. The idea is that whatever you want to know; We have the correct and fluent answer. And after getting that answer, there is nothing to ask. However, they do not have time to say that they are true cricket lovers. Otherwise, what else is the country's cricket eats chetepute money?

Now anyone you ask about cricket related responsibilities will show you Australia-New Zealand like Mr. Nannu. Shamim Chowdhury himself; One who is an "unannounced" commentator is obliged to get proper understanding even if he is questioned.

In the end, all of this country is like a developed country! Except for the results ....