I also invite you to take a look at similarweb.com/website/blurt.blog. The deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in search engines is radically transforming how we find information online. As a result, organic search, which relies on search engine optimization (SEO) and non-AI algorithms, might become less effective and visible. Websites and content that do not adapt to this new era might find themselves relegated to lower positions in search results. In some cases, they may even be replaced by summaries directly on the search engine without any link, making it harder to reach their target audience. Therefore, maintaining a strong presence on all web2 social networks is important, even if these networks often play the shadow ban card as soon as you post an external link. That's why it's so important to be imaginative in how to publish content on these networks.
RE: How many people visit blurt.blog - part 2 [ENG/PL]
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How many people visit blurt.blog - part 2 [ENG/PL]
thanks for the recommendation.
Everything you write is of course true. The question is: how are we prepared to meet these changes? The word web3 sounds proud, but it turns out that web3 turns into AI corporate web ;] Intellectual property turns into "material for AI training"
Maybe blurt should, for example, provide the service of selling data for AI training, in the sense that it should somehow be legally regulated whether the intellectual property of users who publish here can be the object of AI training and, if so, under what conditions. I'm just fantasizing because, to be honest, I haven't really explored this topic yet and I don't even know what to suggest. As part of the web 3 philosophy, web users should in any case benefit financially from the fact that their material was used to teach AI