RE: Trial By Jury

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Trial By Jury

in philosophy •  6 days ago 

Reggie should have considered buying this course and gain him an advantage. Was this a real story which I don't doubt that there may be many like it in their own unique way of how it happened, the states injustice cystem is more focused on using whatever reason to capitalize on a misfortune of events. This is just a reality of what they do. One of many. Albeit most times when it comes to homicide and murder cases, when the perp is sentenced, it is usually the one who did it the crime. The injustice cystem works to a degree when taking seriously to find all evidence. And that is what needs to be in questioning. Is it all the evidence?

Although most times a judge will say your right to appeal is revoked because XYZ reason, it's a lie because there is laws, and acts that supposedly protect us. Supposedly because it only will protect if you know how to use that defense. And most times lawyers can be shady and be lazy to do the work as well as attorneys who withhold evidence to submit.

Cheers.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  

The story was concocted, not real, though cases have arisen that are of similar nature. It baffles me how many decisions that humans have taken control over making without the adequate equipment to do so (brains that are free of biases and more perfectly able to reason). And the thing is, they probably all 'feel' they are correct, and that they are smart. Post-hoc, they will sooth themselves with rationalizing their decisions, because this is more comfortable than admitting one could be incorrect.

The incentive structure is also broken in our judicial system. The incentives should be to try and ascertain the truth in a situation (or at least that which has the highest probability of being true), but with a little more money added into the equation, one side is absolutely capable of defending their client whether they are guilty or not. A lawyer wants to win a case, not to determine the truth of the situation. Jurors want to go home, and judges want to eat.

  ·  6 days ago  ·  

AD Space is mismanaged


only the injured should stand trial
https://tzla.hrpartner.io/jobs/-chief-of-staff-at-tzla-2zez5

evidence to submit Cheers 🥓

Won't be very useful if their pre-existing conditions deny them the insurance coverage to get such a treatment.