IMO the best public med site is Medscape.
eg https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/846566-overview (assuming that is what u have)
you may need to login, but just pretend to be a med student ;-)
it is one of the few sites that offers half-decent DDx (differential diagnosis) - so it might not even be what you think it is.
The fundamental question for bioelectromagnetics is the identification of the biochemical and
biophysical conditions under which applied magnetic fields (MFs) could be recognized by cells in
order to further modulate cell and tissue functioning. This actually is achieved by identifying and
investigating resonance and window conditions.
very good book.
like I said, before one can find a cure, best to understand what that might even look like. :-)
it might not be that such tumors need killing, but rather need a signal to inform them they are in the wrong place.
also interesting how your ref paper talks about insomnia. I have long thought that a large influence, esp in urban areas, is the constant pulsed microwave signals that interfere with some people's ability to decrease their brain frequency down to sleep levels.
For decades, the idea of thermal effects in bioelectromagnetics had been introduced and became
the subject of intensive discussions, related to specific absorption rate (SAR) as useful criteria. It
is clear that SAR requires a threshold value determination. I am categorically against the thermal
approach as the only possible mechanism for EMF interactions. This approach continues for several
decades based upon the engineering approach developed by ICNIRP and IEEE committees. They
went even further, claiming that “only possible biological mechanism of EMF interaction is thermal” (Cho and D’Andrea, 2003).
This is how the propaganda was created, affirmed and spread. They are liars.
I know - I've been in meetings where we were told that the word "resonance" shall never be mentioned in any "science communication" context.
Keep the propaganda going.
microwaves = ovens = thermal
the blindingly obvious fact that microwave telephony also carries information should never be translated into "biological information" - that is, effects.
The IEEE include the bastards who are perfectly aware of the resonant frequencies of air molecules, but only as engineering concerns, coz, well, water and oxygen have nothing to do with life, right!
OK, hope you've read some of the background comments and link to texts. I present them, not to give you many 100s of hours of reading, but as I am still slightly in the dark as to your actual condition, you may see chapter headings that look interesting to you, and that is at least a step forward.
As for the one paper you presented, the oral transmission of EMF seems peculiar, and there is a diagram showing the routes of such signals, up through the temple and along the spine. This is not highly targeted, but I imagine is one way to transmit through the "meatware". However, they did not include any skin cancers, and their other papers mention it briefly. All of which means, I suspect they don't have the resonant frequencies.
So, IMO you'd have to do the analysis first and not rely on their current list of target frequencies. Being on the skin and external, some PEMF devices might be better suited and more local. But, unless you can find precise frequencies that have already been catalogued, then best do the analysis first - and that will require some extra equipment, such as a frequency scanner.
If you can find someone local, might be worth at least a conversation.
IMO the best public med site is Medscape.
eg https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/846566-overview (assuming that is what u have)
you may need to login, but just pretend to be a med student ;-)
it is one of the few sites that offers half-decent DDx (differential diagnosis) - so it might not even be what you think it is.
This is amusing
https://libgen.rocks/ads.php?md5=8239828884babedf19fefffdaa46dffa&downloadname=10.1007/bf00834104
from 1980 ;-) but, of course, EMF pollution has no effect on humans.
Found this too
;-)
1975 idea.
Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medicine-1482248506.pdf
or
https://libgen.li/file.php?id=92364983
very good book.
like I said, before one can find a cure, best to understand what that might even look like. :-)
it might not be that such tumors need killing, but rather need a signal to inform them they are in the wrong place.
also interesting how your ref paper talks about insomnia. I have long thought that a large influence, esp in urban areas, is the constant pulsed microwave signals that interfere with some people's ability to decrease their brain frequency down to sleep levels.
This is how the propaganda was created, affirmed and spread. They are liars.
I know - I've been in meetings where we were told that the word "resonance" shall never be mentioned in any "science communication" context.
Keep the propaganda going.
microwaves = ovens = thermal
the blindingly obvious fact that microwave telephony also carries information should never be translated into "biological information" - that is, effects.
The IEEE include the bastards who are perfectly aware of the resonant frequencies of air molecules, but only as engineering concerns, coz, well, water and oxygen have nothing to do with life, right!
in case you don't see the others, here's another fun read
Bioelectromagnetic Medicine
[ipfs pdf]
OK, hope you've read some of the background comments and link to texts. I present them, not to give you many 100s of hours of reading, but as I am still slightly in the dark as to your actual condition, you may see chapter headings that look interesting to you, and that is at least a step forward.
As for the one paper you presented, the oral transmission of EMF seems peculiar, and there is a diagram showing the routes of such signals, up through the temple and along the spine. This is not highly targeted, but I imagine is one way to transmit through the "meatware". However, they did not include any skin cancers, and their other papers mention it briefly. All of which means, I suspect they don't have the resonant frequencies.
So, IMO you'd have to do the analysis first and not rely on their current list of target frequencies. Being on the skin and external, some PEMF devices might be better suited and more local. But, unless you can find precise frequencies that have already been catalogued, then best do the analysis first - and that will require some extra equipment, such as a frequency scanner.
If you can find someone local, might be worth at least a conversation.
Thanks, and yes there is so much information in the comments here it will take me some time to sift through and investigate.
Thank you for sharing your time to look into this and giving your thoughts on it.