RE: The Ultimate Property Right

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The Ultimate Property Right

in life •  2 years ago 

Have you delved into the medical lit? Actual research papers.

I haven't, and not sure where I would start. My already low estimation of most accepted medical truth was pushed even lower once the Covid scheme started, and we saw supposed gold standard bearers such as the Lancet publishing false information.

I had tried initially looking into alternative treatments, which had led me to raspberry cream. I tried it for months and the only result I got was more bleeding and scabbing, nothing diminished/shrunk.

I assume that it's possible that at times they hide truth amidst the many falsities they push, so after a quick search i found this from a site I question on your suggestion of electromagnetic as a treatment.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3845545/

Given your familiarity on this topic, does anything presented here look worthy of spending time delving into?

I had contemplated using a red light, as I have one I had bought for my dogs leg. My concern with it was it speeds up cells (supposedly) and I was concerned it might speed up the cancer.

Any further insights you could offer would be appreciated.

Regardless on whether I find an answer or not, I'm at peace with what I see happening and appears to be coming. My agitation is around the interaction of others and making a change to a point where I can be totally self sufficient as the time comes where those around me will have to declare a position on my choice.

Thanks as always for sharing from your vast knowledge bank. I feel blessed I encountered you when I came to Blurt, and have considered you somewhat of a mentor.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  

I haven't, and not sure where I would start. My already low estimation of most accepted medical truth was pushed even lower once the Covid scheme started, and we saw supposed gold standard bearers such as the Lancet publishing false information.

Right, but sometimes can find interesting results even tho the conclusions are wrong - coz they are not allowed to be real scientists. I've seen that a few times.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

I just scanned the paper, they are selling their device, but is quite nice as they include a lot of history and methodologies - lots of useful jargon too!

I took a slightly different approach - instead of "looking for a cure" (which didn't exist), I researched to try to understand what could possibly be going on. Doctors are generally quite useless, they are car-mechanics, not engineers, and don't always keep up to date. They are also more interested in selling drugs than curing anything.

So, I'd also start at whatever you're told is your "condition" and look at whether anybody truly knows the cause, or causes, or even just molecules related to the process that may be ignored in trad "therapies". "skin cancer" could be dermatology or oncology - I'd bet the latter as they get far more money!

Also note how much is known about bioelectromagnetism, even tho there is no such therapeutic dept! eg I now suspect IBS is caused by crushing the solar plexus, which informs the GI tract. No pill will cure that - one needs to meditate and bring back to life that chakra, or a vertebra reset can also help.

Anyway, kinda vague advice, but anything in detail, just ask.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

I'll read it properly, prob Monday now.

Thank you

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

IMO the best public med site is Medscape.
eg https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/846566-overview (assuming that is what u have)
you may need to login, but just pretend to be a med student ;-)
it is one of the few sites that offers half-decent DDx (differential diagnosis) - so it might not even be what you think it is.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

This is amusing
https://libgen.rocks/ads.php?md5=8239828884babedf19fefffdaa46dffa&downloadname=10.1007/bf00834104
from 1980 ;-) but, of course, EMF pollution has no effect on humans.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Found this too

The fundamental question for bioelectromagnetics is the identification of the biochemical and
biophysical conditions under which applied magnetic fields (MFs) could be recognized by cells in
order to further modulate cell and tissue functioning. This actually is achieved by identifying and
investigating resonance and window conditions.

;-)
1975 idea.

Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medicine-1482248506.pdf

or

https://libgen.li/file.php?id=92364983

very good book.
like I said, before one can find a cure, best to understand what that might even look like. :-)
it might not be that such tumors need killing, but rather need a signal to inform them they are in the wrong place.

also interesting how your ref paper talks about insomnia. I have long thought that a large influence, esp in urban areas, is the constant pulsed microwave signals that interfere with some people's ability to decrease their brain frequency down to sleep levels.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

For decades, the idea of thermal effects in bioelectromagnetics had been introduced and became
the subject of intensive discussions, related to specific absorption rate (SAR) as useful criteria. It
is clear that SAR requires a threshold value determination. I am categorically against the thermal
approach as the only possible mechanism for EMF interactions. This approach continues for several
decades based upon the engineering approach developed by ICNIRP and IEEE committees. They
went even further, claiming that “only possible biological mechanism of EMF interaction is thermal” (Cho and D’Andrea, 2003).

This is how the propaganda was created, affirmed and spread. They are liars.
I know - I've been in meetings where we were told that the word "resonance" shall never be mentioned in any "science communication" context.

Keep the propaganda going.
microwaves = ovens = thermal
the blindingly obvious fact that microwave telephony also carries information should never be translated into "biological information" - that is, effects.

The IEEE include the bastards who are perfectly aware of the resonant frequencies of air molecules, but only as engineering concerns, coz, well, water and oxygen have nothing to do with life, right!

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

in case you don't see the others, here's another fun read
Bioelectromagnetic Medicine
[ipfs pdf]

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

OK, hope you've read some of the background comments and link to texts. I present them, not to give you many 100s of hours of reading, but as I am still slightly in the dark as to your actual condition, you may see chapter headings that look interesting to you, and that is at least a step forward.

As for the one paper you presented, the oral transmission of EMF seems peculiar, and there is a diagram showing the routes of such signals, up through the temple and along the spine. This is not highly targeted, but I imagine is one way to transmit through the "meatware". However, they did not include any skin cancers, and their other papers mention it briefly. All of which means, I suspect they don't have the resonant frequencies.

So, IMO you'd have to do the analysis first and not rely on their current list of target frequencies. Being on the skin and external, some PEMF devices might be better suited and more local. But, unless you can find precise frequencies that have already been catalogued, then best do the analysis first - and that will require some extra equipment, such as a frequency scanner.

If you can find someone local, might be worth at least a conversation.

Thanks, and yes there is so much information in the comments here it will take me some time to sift through and investigate.

Thank you for sharing your time to look into this and giving your thoughts on it.