The old 'poison is in the dose' is the phrase they constantly use to justify vaccines as well as other drugs. I think it's also false. I think the poison is in the mode of entry myself. Clearly demonstrated by your very last sentence.
RE: Do Viruses Really Exist?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Do Viruses Really Exist?
Also true of homeopathy, tho.
Hahnemann was genuinely perplexed that it worked at all!
Yeah, injections are like having the city gates protecting the people, then seeing parachutes coming down. I mean, you wouldn't inject burgers into people to feed them.
A little different with homeopathy as there is no physical trace of the ingredient only it's energetic trace. have you read anything about how water can communicate? It explains how homeopathy works when you understand this. I keep forgetting the name of the woman who's done the ice pictures, fascinating stuff.
I think this is more interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_teleportation
and surprised Wankipedia has a whole page, without (so far) the snarling allegations of fakery.
Notice also, the slight back-tracking re "cold fusion" - those poor bastards should have had a Nobel prize, instead they were lynched and ended up hiding away in government laboratories!!
I didn't see anything on cold-fusion is that another page ur referring to? Rings a bell.
sorry, was in the previous page I was reading = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_memory
Montagnier was still deluded in that he believed in HIV and viruses. Interesting tho, he was starting to veer to far from the beaten track so guess he had to go huh.
They state all the 'bacterial DNA' was removed but Beauchamp and Naessens both stated that bacteria can't be killed. They instead put out spores which can then grow anew. I wonder if this is what they were picking up? Did they retest the sample a little later to check if that was the case? It doesn't say.
The sending of the wav files tho to another lab miles away is very interesting yes. Just goes to show telekenesis is real after all.
I find the 'scientific method' takes the thinking out of science. This book looks interesting to me -
Interesting. So you would say that the statement "at the right dose, poisons can cure" is wrong?
Would you say that about LSD too, for example? Just curious.
Yes I don't think any 'drug' cures anything especially when you shift your thinking as to what disease actually is, as in our bodies heal themselves and in the process the symptoms are labelled as disease.
Drugs only stop that process so we may think we are better but we are not cured. The healing is stopped. Not sure what you mean about LSD which produces a shift in consciousness?
Sorry for my late reply.
Yes, I know that already from personal experiences (in case of stopping a fever too soon, it may stretch the disease-full times even longer), for example.
To answer your question: If the dose does not make the poison then there is no over dose which causes damage? To take another example (and not LSD) what about sleeping pills taken in great amounts? It is said that they can cause death. Do you know anything about it?
They say too much of anything can kill you. There is obviously SOME truth in 'the poison is in the dose' but it's not that simple. I think this is where the old 'immune system' story comes in. If you take germs and viruses out of the story and substitute poisons or toxins you will find your answer.