When we say 'viruses don't exist' it's a perfectly relevant statement as we are claiming their definition of a virus (which they made up and have changed 3 times now) is what doesn't exist. The definition is of a pathogenic element therefore it's pointless to say some are pathogenic and others not. That would be like saying some poisons are not poisonous.
By the way how do you know bacteriophage are pathogenic to bacteria? Only because that is what you are told right? Did you know they took the theory of bacteriophage and slotted it onto their theory of viruses?
The exosome theory is more to the point BUT when Kaufman started saying viruses are exosomes that also just confused people.
Viruses do not exist is simple and clear. No-one said sub-microscopic particles don't exist. What we want is proof of claim. They claim, well you now what they claim, without solid proof. Arguing over the minutae of the language is pointless at this juncture. The challenge is very clear and precise.
I think this discussion answers both @clixmoney and @rycharde re the 'no virus' and the 'believing'. It also answers a lot more.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6jOdghV1aYUw/
Yes, that is precisely why I made the comment.
And that would be true! The poison is in the dose. ;-) At the right dose, poisons can be cures.
Language is important, hence a correct new language needs to be already prepared to sort out what does exist and has been misclassified, as well as what truly doesn't exist at all and has been fabricated by, for example, DNA reconstruction.
One thing I noted from the very start of the kovidity scam was the availability of the alleged virus for labs with credentials, and yet they never, ever, could find such a thing within humans. So... how did they get all those "covid" samples from? And it is from those "samples" that they calibrated all the tests. This is not even science - it is pure logical bollox. Those few private labs willing to speak in forums, all said they could find nothing in alleged "positive victims" other than sometimes influenza. But even then, so influenza does exist? I recall one paper where they randomly tested patients allegedly treated for flu and found merely 10% showed signs of the influenza virus (according to the test).
The biggest jokes are the "transmission" experiments - I don't think ANY has ever shown the human to human transmission of a virus. They have to be injected to be infected. I leave it there. Could be an ad slogan!
The old 'poison is in the dose' is the phrase they constantly use to justify vaccines as well as other drugs. I think it's also false. I think the poison is in the mode of entry myself. Clearly demonstrated by your very last sentence.
Also true of homeopathy, tho.
Hahnemann was genuinely perplexed that it worked at all!
Yeah, injections are like having the city gates protecting the people, then seeing parachutes coming down. I mean, you wouldn't inject burgers into people to feed them.
A little different with homeopathy as there is no physical trace of the ingredient only it's energetic trace. have you read anything about how water can communicate? It explains how homeopathy works when you understand this. I keep forgetting the name of the woman who's done the ice pictures, fascinating stuff.
I think this is more interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_teleportation
and surprised Wankipedia has a whole page, without (so far) the snarling allegations of fakery.
Notice also, the slight back-tracking re "cold fusion" - those poor bastards should have had a Nobel prize, instead they were lynched and ended up hiding away in government laboratories!!
I didn't see anything on cold-fusion is that another page ur referring to? Rings a bell.
sorry, was in the previous page I was reading = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_memory
Montagnier was still deluded in that he believed in HIV and viruses. Interesting tho, he was starting to veer to far from the beaten track so guess he had to go huh.
They state all the 'bacterial DNA' was removed but Beauchamp and Naessens both stated that bacteria can't be killed. They instead put out spores which can then grow anew. I wonder if this is what they were picking up? Did they retest the sample a little later to check if that was the case? It doesn't say.
The sending of the wav files tho to another lab miles away is very interesting yes. Just goes to show telekenesis is real after all.
I find the 'scientific method' takes the thinking out of science. This book looks interesting to me -
Interesting. So you would say that the statement "at the right dose, poisons can cure" is wrong?
Would you say that about LSD too, for example? Just curious.
Yes I don't think any 'drug' cures anything especially when you shift your thinking as to what disease actually is, as in our bodies heal themselves and in the process the symptoms are labelled as disease.
Drugs only stop that process so we may think we are better but we are not cured. The healing is stopped. Not sure what you mean about LSD which produces a shift in consciousness?
Sorry for my late reply.
Yes, I know that already from personal experiences (in case of stopping a fever too soon, it may stretch the disease-full times even longer), for example.
To answer your question: If the dose does not make the poison then there is no over dose which causes damage? To take another example (and not LSD) what about sleeping pills taken in great amounts? It is said that they can cause death. Do you know anything about it?
They say too much of anything can kill you. There is obviously SOME truth in 'the poison is in the dose' but it's not that simple. I think this is where the old 'immune system' story comes in. If you take germs and viruses out of the story and substitute poisons or toxins you will find your answer.