RE: High quality content … is it really necessary?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

High quality content … is it really necessary?

in blurt •  2 years ago  (edited)

I vote for the person and not really their post, because if I do not like them I will just be like a quiet ghost. I do value the quality by what the message of the post conveys, although I am also guilty of not reading the post anyways.

The question of quality depends upon the person, putting a value on posts will just depend on various positive or negative reasons. It is up to the individuals on how they would create a blog, it can be a spam to some but for some they like the post.

Because Blurt is about freedom but we have to keep in mind, there are still sensible and unwritten rules that we just have to obey.

For one thing we have to keep in mind Blurt is a "pay to play" website. We pay for our thing to get posted here but still we have rules to abide. @ultravioletmag.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  

🤬 I vote frankly...


Each and every time 🥓

  ·  2 years ago  ·  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  
I couldn't agree more and so writing is what I do. If we listen to ourselves we can create things to share it here too.
Of course there are so many things of what to post about, you can just scratch the soil down below and tell Blurt what it is all about.
This whole thing about Miss Mag's engaging blog post, is just a case of normal people collected together in a house and beginning to get into each others nerves and throats.

Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org