The current system simply lacks two things:
more elements of direct democracy through regular referenda on EVERY issue.
The ability to withdraw votes for delegates, as we do on Blurt.
And a ban on financing presidential campaigns and elections with money other than the equally allocated ex officio. I believe that every candidate who gets elected should receive the same amount of money from our taxes, so that each candidate could present themselves and their program to others equally. In the current system, only those with large sponsors will always win, and sponsors, as we know, are most often large corporations and "philanthropies" like Gates.
@theocu began using his AI, "AVA," to start identifying such exploits...
crobotics as we speak 🧑🦼
it would turn the current corrupt system upside down, a great idea
yes, people unfortunately have a short memory for politicians' antics, and after the election sausage they even get amnesia. Something like this would ensure that no politician would thumb his nose at voters or his career would end faster than it began.
https://blurt.blog/@frankbacon/sn5rnu
🥓
Why would those in power supports these measures?
I'm of the opinion that a local city (sitting) counsel could be run appropriately using this or a similar Cloned version of this chain. Meta, X, IG and others are just sinister systems of specious realities that disorganize groups and their aims. In principal, and assembly could be conducted worldwide with weighted results that could solve real world issues, if everyone weren't too busy in a popularity contest.
It's a moot point because the "Tech" that's coming is beyond Free Will 🥓
Truth is, power structures come in more than just its governmental iterations.
stru
🌮