RE: Marvelous Marvin Versus The Establishment

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Marvelous Marvin Versus The Establishment

in epistem •  2 years ago 

This as not about public opinion or what the public can 'take'. It's about cold hard facts and the law. You can't have censorship in this scenario. There was censorship so it was a scam IMO.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  

I beg to differ. It is all about the established view. What began a hundred years ago (or more), got foot into society and therefor the medicine sector, you will not be able to make go away altogether and maybe even not within your lifetime.
In order to change a worldview (which it is in my notion), strong like it is, you need a steady breath. And, despite things not taking up speed or are not as successful as one likes it to be, to not bother too much. In order not to wore yourself out or become fatalistic, for example.

For me, your argument comes across like this: You live in a house with several rooms, where you find a nice neighborhood, have water and electricity, but some leaky and old windows. You say that this house is all trash and the landlord has scammed you.

Füllmich stated that one of the interviews from which they recorded a session has not been streamed, because Ms. Fischer decided not to put it online. If that is true, I also find it a bad move and would also be pissed if others got no hearing. But I still argue that the rest of their work was worth it and payed into the greater movement itself. I see that you don't see it that way, so it's just two different judgements about one organization.

If I would dump everything where I find flaws as a scam, I would be very busy to find flaws and may oversee where there was the opposite.

  ·  2 years ago  ·   (edited)

Did you read the German critique of the committee's Lanka interview?
It was clear to the 'no virus' camp (using the word camp loosely) that the committee was rinsing people for money and buying time before his interview confirmed it.
I was suspicious way back in 2020 when Fuellmich got himself arrested at one of the London demo's very publicly obviously to garner publicity and sympathy. I thought it odd that a top lawyer let himself be dragged away yet no-one else who spoke that day did.
It's easier to fool someone than to show them they've been fooled.
https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2022/02/09/carry-on-at-the-corona-commitee/
German version here: https://telegra.ph/Quoten-Kritiker-02-06


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

Loading...