I propose that human development on Earth is cyclical and we have reached great technological heights many times in the past (evident in cautionary tales such as the Tower of Babylon & Atlantis) only to be destroyed by our own hubris and the best care taker of all, mother nature. It is a cycle as old as time but no matter how dramatic the fall of each empire or force of each cataclysm some humans always survive and with them knowledge of old world technologies. But not everyone wants the same thing in a brave new world starting out afresh.
After the last cataclysm (which I believe was a flood around 300 years ago) a small group of people who perceived themselves to be above the rest decide to withhold the old technologies for themselves through unscrupulous means, re-write history and control the apparent evolution of humanity in a way which permits them to always be the ones behind the latest innovations like telephones, planes, computers, nanotech or gene altering drugs, steering human development at their chosen pace and in their chosen direction.
For some the opportunity to play god is simply too great a temptation and one doesn't have to look far to find evidence that the technology being used on humanity today had already been fully realised a long time ago.
Part of the system for getting people to accept each new technology as being a natural offshoot of the last great innovation is a drip feed of visual prompts and news pieces leading up to its release. Most of us are chomping at the bit to sign up for whatever it happens to be long before they even give it to us, completely unaware that new tech is actually old tech.
Electric vehicles
If you ask the average person today how long ago electric cars were invented they will generally respond with anything from 5 to 10 years. Indeed, we have been trained to think this way, so it may surprise you to learn that we actually had electric cars over 100 years ago.
Here is a French taxi, dated 1898. Powered by electricity.
An electric car being charged outside a home in 1900.
This one goes 150 miles on a single charge, 1910.
Here you can see a lady charging her electric car from her home garage using a mercury arc rectifier, 1912.
During the last century we had further innovations such as electric scooters for adults, 1935.
And even electric scooter races for children, 1932.
The victor seen here!
These images serve as concrete proof we were well acquainted 100 years ago with the idea of using electricity to get around. So what happened? Well, the obvious answer is gasoline and its potential to make money for investors.
But the less obvious answer is that free energy is a real thing and many people still remembered how to make it. So the car industry, which was at that time one of the most potentially profitable industries to be involved in as an investor, was shifted to focus exclusively on petrol engines which people could no longer create their own fuel for.
Electric cars have been permitted to make their come-back now because none of us remember any more how to make free energy.
More advanced in the past
Human life on Earth we are told extends out in a linear fashion from a bunch of monkeys who learned how to walk upright and use tools. But this is just a fairytale of course, which much like the tale of a globe earth, is designed to distract us from the truth and create a schism in our psyche, forever holding us to the notion that it is okay to accept absurd-sounding information as truth.
As children the truth is obvious (monkeys are monkeys, humans are humans & you can't walk up-side-down on a ball) yet we are forced to accept something which sounds illogical, ultimately setting us up for a lifetime of believing illogical truths presented to us by authority figures.
In fear of getting side-tracked here I want simply to make the point that we did not evolve from monkeys! On the contrary, innumerable human civilisations have come and gone in the past and I can say this with certainty because there is proof.
OOPART
There are so many 'out-of-place artefacts' in the world today they are now lovingly referred to as ooparts.
This oopart was found embedded in a rock which was estimated to have formed around 300 million years ago. So how is it that it contains a metal nut & bolt?
This one is the same story. Metal screw inside an ancient rock.
There are loads of oopart screws in fact and why not? Even advanced civilisations would have used this most basic item.
This very electrical looking component was found embedded in 100,000 year old stone.
This tungsten nanospiral was found in the Ural mountains, embedded in rock which was 100,000 years old.
It was found along with other nano pieces including metal coils, spirals and shafts, all of which obviously would have required advanced technology to create.
Images like this one present a problem for geologists and historians alike.
It's just unfortunate that geology & history, like every other important institution of thought have been usurped by that same group of people I mentioned earlier and can therefore no longer be trusted.
So, either we were more advanced than we are being told in the distant past or it doesn't take millions of years for organic material to turn into rock.
The WOW! lines
Something else I came across recently which seems to fit this theme are the WOW! lines. These ones are in Russia but they are in fact all over the world.
I know many of you won't watch the above video (which you really should!) so I will drops some screen shots for you now.
These 'lines' are just over 1000m wide and comprised of neat rows of trees.
They run for thousands of miles, always straight but with multiple sharp corners, zig-zagging though incredible landscapes.
It is said they are 'shelter-beds', built by Russian farmers in the 1700s to protect soil from erosion and give crops shelter from the wind.
Sounds plausible enough I suppose (despite the sheer enormity of the constructions) but this theory hits a big problem when we see the huge swaths of land which appear to run over the top of the lines. How can this be possible if they were made in the last few centuries?
What would you say came first here, the lines or the river?
I know we're not talking about a particularly big river here (around 100m wide) but if we look into how long it took to form rivers like the Mississippi or the Nile we will find answers ranging from 1 - 30 million years. Yet this one managed to appear in little more than a few 100 years? Is that even possible?
Something doesn't fit here and to me it seems evident the cities, the roads, the canals, the rivers and huge areas of land all appeared after the creation of the lines.
So, either the lines were built millions of years ago or they were built more recently by Russian farmers as we are told, but if the latter is true we can be certain something enormous (like a flood or mud flood) has since destroyed large areas of them and created rives over the top.
In places the lines appear to be ripped apart, almost as if the land itself has shifted in the past during some kind of unthinkable earthquake.
All of which fits with my theory of a massive cataclysm around 300 years ago.
Again I feel myself getting off track here but the main point I want to make is that with the above evidence in mind, can you see now why it isn't too much of a leap to believe we had electricity in the past?
Indeed, it could be made in a plethora of creative ways, some of which we still have record of. Some of which we don't. They have been withheld from us! Erased from our consciousness until such time as it is deemed the correct moment to re-release them.
And so to recap:
300 years ago there was a cataclysm which regressed evolution by 1000s of years.
200 years ago a group of people decided to use this situation to their advantage.
100 years ago there were still a few people left who had knowledge of pre-reset technology and they were finding ways at that time to create free energy which was used not only to power vehicles but a great many other advanced machines.
Today we have no idea about the lives of these great people, or if we do, our perception of what their name means has been augmented by some trick like Tesla motors deflecting from the genius of Nikola Tesla, a man all too familiar with the idea of free energy.
Bob Marley says it best at this point, "You can fool some people some times, but you can't fool all the people all the time."
And so, it is with great pleasure that I present to you now one of the many ways in which you can generate electricity for your home, for free, forever & without any moving parts.
The Earth Battery
Earth batteries tap into the natural currents of the earth using zinc & copper electrodes in the ground and have been used for the past two centuries to power small devices, but keep reading because they can also power big devices if you understand this concept fully.
Alexander Bain
The first earth battery they say was created by Alexander Bain in 1843, to power a clock.
The zinc anode and copper cathode are displayed as Z and C.
In his 1852 design he demonstrates how you don't even need the ground to make this work. Just two vases of soil.
How does it work?
When you place a zinc anode and a copper cathode in a container of wet mud, the two metals start reacting, because zinc loses electrons easier than copper and because the mud contains ions. By wetting the dirt, it turns into a true electrolyte solution. Therefore, the electrodes start exchanging electrons, just like an ordinary battery does.
source
Earth batteries are not a conspiracy or even a secret. In fact, they are clearly documented on wikipedia as being "a pair of electrodes made of two dissimilar metals, such as iron and copper, which are buried in the soil or immersed in the sea. Earth batteries act as water activated batteries. If the plates are sufficiently far apart, they can tap telluric currents."
On telluric currents wiki says this:
A telluric current (from Latin tellūs, "earth"), or Earth current, is an electric current which moves underground or through the sea. Telluric currents result from both natural causes and human activity, and the discrete currents interact in a complex pattern. The currents are extremely low frequency and travel over large areas at or near the surface of the Earth.
Obviously one must take this description with a large pinch of salt, but interesting none-the-less to see this kind of information hiding in plain sight.
Michael Emme
What wikipedia doesn't tell you is that in 1893 a Frenchman by the name of Michael Emme figured out how to tap into these natural currents to get serious levels of power from an earth battery configuration of his own design.
In this particular unit (which he describes in his US 495,582 patent) he gets 56 amps at just under 54 volts, which is three kilowatts or 4 HP.
In fairness Wiki do actually list his patent at the bottom of their Earth Battery page along with other related patents from the last two centuries.
For those of you wanting to see the full details of Emme's patent (in order to produce 3 kilowatts) this video presents it in a convenient manner.
Just to give you some perspective here, the most power hungry application in my home is a professional blender which comes in at around one kilowatt. So with Emme's configuration of metal rods wired together in my garden I could power three electric blenders forever, for free. Which would be great if I had a juice stall!
But the most obvious thing of course is to just power your home with it.
Endlessly increase your voltage & current
Importantly, Michael Emme states in his 1893 patent that by selecting the number and connection method of the individual components, any desired voltage and/or current supply can be had.
The voltage level was discovered to increase linearly by joining several earth battery cells in series like a commercial lead acid battery. The load current increased by connecting earth cells in parallel. The source current capacities were also discovered to increase by adding to the surface areas of the electrodes.
This is a pretty key factor I think you will agree and knowing this one has to ask the question, why don't we have free energy generators (which were well understood over 100 years ago) everywhere today?
Well, that would be because they are not yet ready to re-release free energy to us. Though I do believe that day will eventually come.
Evidence on YouTube
Keen to find anyone out there who was creating earth batteries to run their home I looked to YouTube and found the same censorship as I found last week while researching how to re-grow teeth.
I did however find a man I am already familiar with.
Robert Murray-Smith is an inventor who is always up for the challenge of building stuff to see if it actually works. In a previous post I mentioned a methanol fuel heater he made out of cake tins and tin cans, but in this post I want to show you his basic explanation of the earth battery.
I know you don't have time to watch all these videos but in this follow-up film he very importantly demonstrates how to increase (endlessly) the amount of voltage you can get from the earth.
Just in case you were in any doubt about the validity of my claims here.
Earth Capacitor
I was also able to find this document published last year which outlines various improvements on the original design. The capacitor sheet method they say is far better than using pipes or rods, because by using sheets you will get much more amperage out of your system.
And as a single unit in the ground this system is useful for those who don't have much land.
The more sheets of metal you add (cells) the more power you will get.
They say the most effective system they have found is a rolled capacitor.
Though this one seems a bit more complicated to get exactly right if you are building it yourself and I will personally be sticking to the previous design when I build my first free energy generator next year.
To power your household devices you will need to convert the DC to AC using an inverter. Their recommended system is with a deep cycle battery, seen here.
And so, there you have it.
Free energy is real and it isn't even difficult to collect!
We have just been sleeping our whole lives, content with the illusion presented to us.
In conclusion
The notion that we are headed, like all previous civilisations, toward our inevitable doom can be easily overlooked when one immerses themselves in the reality that anything is possible once the boundaries of our imagination have been removed. Worth mentioning too that life is no life at all if you are not living every day like it is your last!
My main intention with this post is not to freak you out with thoughts of impending destruction (we all gotta go some time) but to open your mind and help you free yourself from the pre-determined barriers which have likely been holding you back all your life so that you can start playing with electrical ideas again! Just like we were doing a hundred years ago, back when some of us still remembered how things used to be.
Ah yes, one more thing. I know I mentioned the shape of our playground earlier and this can be a big red flag for some people. All I ask is that you evaluate my words for what they are and don't let my belief that we are not living on a ball floating through space distract you. I don't call myself a flat earther because I am not in a position to say with certainty what we do live on but I can say with certainty that when the establishment present us with an absolute fact (especially one as important as this), true is the last thing it is likely to be. And naive is the word I would use for anyone who believes the establishment lies to them about everything except the most important stuff.
Here are some 'facts' from the establishment on how we can make our own free energy:
A wonderful collection of establishment owned green energy businesses there but did you see the Earth Battery on that list?
No, me neither.
So get out there and start playing with ideas!
The implications of free energy for all are quite literally earth shattering.
Love & Light everyone 💡
Great post. The scooters pictured may not be electric, but there are plenty of other electric vehicles just like you have presented.
Earth Engine is 'Currently' the world's most efficient energy source.
Even though our Sun is shutting down for another Maunder or Dalton Minimum cycle... there is still some good news being censored too....
SAFIRE Project made their announcement SEPT 2, 2019
Thanks for all your super interesting messages here. Each and every one of them has taken me time to digest. So much to learn! You have certainly illustrated one of the points I made here, that free energy can in fact be produced in a plethora of creative ways.
And thank you for reminding me about The WOW! lines... so much interesting information is out there, but more & more difficult to find if it has not been deleted already~! 🖖
So much of our true history has been hidden from us... but thanks to people like Graham Hancock & Randall Carlson we are beginning to glimpse our true past...
Emilia and those kids all drive gasoline engines ,.. electric cars yes ,.. electric scooters ,. not really . You might wanna check that .
;-)
Very misleading of Getty Images if this is not actually an "electric scooter"
Fuel tank , cylinder and a spark plug ,.. any mechanic can see that .
Sorry ,.. but the Earth battery is interesting still .
I might make that some day .
I thought the same thing when I first saw the image but why then is Getty Images (who own this image) specifically calling it electric?
Just seems very odd. They don't normally make mistakes when labelling the details of their photos.
I dont know ,.. ask them ?
I do now sound on next video is fake ,.. and most cars are probably electric ones .
;-)
Awesome shot!
Your posts never cease to amaze. Been looking into 'free energy' too but didn't find the earth battery on my travels. All the DIY things I found were far too technical for my liking yet it is so simple really.
Appreciate your enthusiasm.
I really believe it is simple! And I can't wait to get started on experiments when we have our warm weather back.
@erh.germany's argument that the cost of production outweighs the end result (free energy forever) doesn't stack up for me. Especially in a world where everything is constantly recycled. We already have the metals! Now let's use them for something awesome...
Exactly. Also have you seen the stuff about old buildings being generators. If true then we have a lot of infrastructure already built in old cities.
Which they indeed are, very technical. Which would require this exact technical knowledge to apply them yourself. That is not easy at all and if someone really dives deep into the matter, he or she needs a lot of time for own knowledge gain through experimentation (trial and error) as well as other means (like money and space).
No, it's not simple. It's complicated. It only seems to be simple because whenever someone gives you results of his experiments he uses both knowledge and ready made devices from existing sources, all of which needed a high amount of energy to come into being.
Read my comment, and you'll see what I mean :)
Greetings to you
I feel like you are missing the point.
It is simple for the average person to create free energy in the world we live in today.
That's all I was getting at. Nothing more.
The average person is not an inventor but a user. So I would put it the other way around: It's the efforts of non average people, who deal with the specific, the detail, the peculiar. Of those, who despite ready available applications and networks don't let themselves hinder to re-invent something forgotten or held back.
For this, they needed and are/were dependent on the support of the average peoples - the moment you are capable of inventing or building such a device yourself, you're above average.
Let's play with the scenarios. Let's say you succeed and can now power a coffee maker or an egg boiler with the battery. Let's further assume that you also manage to supply other household appliances with energy. What then?
Would you release this into the world as a freely available blueprint based on your research, time and energy? Would you make the plans available here on the blog or elsewhere? Or provide a detailed video tutorial or several? You would have to expect that people who are not familiar with the subject would want to ask you technical questions, that a lot of people would want to take up your time if you, as the creator of this knowledge, were interested in disseminating it, wouldn't you?
So there are the following problems if you do not want to be the sole beneficiary of such a technology, but seek to share it with as many people as possible.
You may have built a finished battery yourself, but other people have to go through the same process that you have already gone through in order to imitate what you have done. What is easy for you to understand, such as a technical construction manual, the terms used in it, is not for others, complete laymen. For the ignorant to become amateurs and then professionals, it takes tutors, guidance, conversations, an exchange. Let's say, because you say that the thing works one hundred per cent, that every week you receive thirty or more enquiries about where in section A of the instructions this or that has to be done and how, because the person who has the instructions in front of them doesn't understand them properly. What do you do then? Do you say: I'm sorry, people, try it yourself until you succeed. I don't have time for you. Then the matter stands or falls with the intelligence of those who receive your instructions from you free of charge, doesn't it?
But then you still have a problem. If you release your knowledge as open source, what's to stop anyone from taking that manual and applying for a patent on it?
That would be theft of common property, but how would it be known that it was stolen? You can't, when you put it online, search all the patent offices on the planet to see if your manual has been patented somewhere, can you?
That would leave only local, word-of-mouth action, and even then you can't be sure that someone from your immediate environment won't release the whole thing into the online world.
To avoid these issues you might find that a manual is not the propper thing to spread it wide and far, and therefore, a ready made product shall be it. Then you are arriving where all modern technology arrived. If you want to have a ready product you need a production facility, lines, distributions, sales, retailers and all that jazz. You need capital and investment etc pp - to involve as many peoples as beneficiaries - who need not become experts but users of your application.
Of course, you can say that you don't want to set up something as a technical advisor yourself, where you gather a team of technical advisors to meet the many interested enquiries that would want to use such an energy source. But if no one does this on a relevant scale, such knowledge remains rather small-scale and therefore has an air of mystery because it has not arrived in the world of mass commerce.
Finally, to come back to the assumption that such plans disappeared somewhere in drawers and never saw the light of day again, my question would be why? If it were really possible to generate energy with such a small input and a minimal amount of materials, what would have stopped these conspirators from building and using it for themselves in the same way? Their houses, yachts, swimming pools etc. would all have to be powered by exactly that, wouldn't they? Because I would be pretty stupid if I had such knowledge not to use it, wouldn't I?
Having such an interesting secret and not telling anyone except an initiated circle is as unrealistic as it is improbable. You can't really keep such things under wraps because the curiosity, the powers of observation, the many opportunities of information leaks would be exploited.
But even if it were, a big secret, I would consider it irrelevant information, because if you actually feel your own enthusiasm and time and inventive spirit, nothing will stop you from starting from scratch and developing in it, if only you want it strongly enough. Someone who wants something will find ways to move towards it, someone who doesn't want something will find reasons to talk his way out of it or to fall into hopelessness or displeasure.
David LaPoint did exactly what you are asking for back in 2019... He has documented and Open Sourced all his discoveries for anyone to build themselves... this way he does not have to fight the system that would try to stop, or kill him if he competed with big oil.
The Primer Fields Part 3
Do YOU have a 3 D Printer...??? Print one of THESE and BLURT about it~!
PrimerCube
I would love to build one of these if I had a 3D Printer... since it is Open Source and Free to Build~!
The PrimerCube is a revolutionary health enhancement device that utilizes a uniquely structured ionic field.
Website where you can download 3D Printer plans for free. https://primercube.org/
So cool providing me with that video "The Primer Fields Part 3"
I found it to be very interesting and I appreciated the pace and the repetitions in it, so I was more able to follow the explanations of what photons are and how they "behave" and this field theory. It's for students, I guess. I never fully grasped the slit experiment but this one gave it a really good go and I give you many many thanks for that!
It reminded me also a bit of some of the Startrek episodes where they talk "it's out of phase" and stuff like that. The editors must have had so much fun writing the scenes.
Anyway, this very scientific footage gave me a lot of inspiration and I am motivated to use what it has left me with for a text or a story, I am yet undecided where to post it.
For the rest:
I remain being a nuisance in pointing out that the latest video of Mr. LaPoint is two years old where he promises to give more footage of "how to generate energy" but not with what design he showed having in his studio but with something else. It remains being on the hold.
The primer cube is not much of interest to me. I just briefly checked the website and found the manual in order to build that thing oneself. It confirms what I already expressed here, that things are not easy to build and that you have to have quite some knowledge and skills in, for example, basic mathematics, physics or chemistry and also in using your hands to complete a device on your own.
I think you have to put into perspective that David is a '1 man show' who has released everything he can as 'Open Source' while the whole time being scorned & ridiculed by most of the 'Establishment Science Horde' and he is also being shadow banned to keep his information from going viral... He walks a difficult and dangerous path that many others have been murdered for.
It is a device that is said to be healing. The open source is for the cube, not for some energy generating device. There are countless of these in the world and forgive me if I am not interested in such things because I do not believe in singular devices or properties that promise me health.
How I think about it, is Human beings are too complex for that, the dynamics of psyche and physique cannot really be brought to a point, i.e. simple cause-and-effect mechanisms. As far as I'm concerned, all people can buy it or copy it and be happy with it.
Will you personally copy it? Have you seen the long list of materials needed? Or will you buy it?
Congratulations!
You have recieved a coconutty upvote! 🥥
Thank you for contributing to the Blurt Blockchain!
Keep up the great work!
Curated by @outofthematrix!
Please take a moment to vote for my witness.
🗳️ https://blurtwallet.com/~witnesses?highlight=outofthematrix
Thanks!
What does that have to do with free energy production if you take materials that are only brought into their state of a certain purity or compound through the manufacturing process in the first place?
If you take metals like copper, zinc, lead, carbon, aluminium, steel, then energy has already been used to produce such metals or precious metals. They don't grow on trees and can simply be picked.
Furthermore, you can't measure the strength of the voltages if you don't have a measuring device that reads off the numbers. A lot of energy has already gone into the manufacturing process of such readers to bring them into existence in the first place.
From the extraction of the required raw materials, composites, mass production by machine, distribution, retail sales and payment by the end user or industry. To extract enough raw materials from the earth, you need machines or muscle power, you need knowledge of where to find the coveted raw materials and how to pull or isolate them from the source, etc. etc.
There are countless individual steps in this entire value chain, all of which first use energy to extract energy.
Here is just a small example for copper:
This means that even if such earth batteries could theoretically be built by you or me and you could use them to generate electricity for appliances or even a house, you would first have to buy (or find) the necessary metals and other materials. In other words, you are using energy that has already been expended, by means of fossil fuels or nuclear energy or some other form of energy. So there is nothing free about it and I find the term misleading.
Apart from that, there is nothing wrong with experimenting with materials and ideas, as the gentleman in your videos does, and keeping a refreshing attitude. He addresses certain issues and it doesn't look like he already knows all the solutions, which he himself freely admits and points out that the commentators under his videos are sources of knowledge. There will be a lot of trial and error and such is perse always a good experience if you want to create something yourself or expand your inventiveness.
But no matter what you undertake, you always need already spent energy, already finished materials, already achieved knowledge. In order to be able to follow certain steps yourself, you need time, learning energy, exchange energy, etc., while you continue to be supplied with food and shelter and also electricity from others.
It may have taken X amount of energy to create the metals etc, but who cares when the amount of energy you can get back from this is unlimited?
It is free energy not because it has cost nothing to create the device which harnesses it but because the energy itself never stops. And from the moment you activate your machine there are no further costs.
It would be nice if you could power your fridge, lights and electrical appliances with the means shown. I have nothing against using or recycling already existing materials, why should I?
It's just that I find the term incorrect. The gentleman in the video, I think, has made it quite clear that he is in an experimental stage with this form of energy generation and has used various combinations of metals to arrive at 0.9 volt current. However, the whole thing shown was not yet a finished energy source and to be convinced that the construction of this battery could be used or would work over a longer period of time, it would have had to be seen in action. Which was not the case.
As long as no one can successfully demonstrate in a self-experiment and proves that the thing works, I remain sceptical about the "simplicity" of the matter. I don't rule out the possibility that it could work, only I don't believe that, firstly, it is that simple and, secondly, that the dimension of the application shown could power various electricity-using devices in a household. Which would make it more interesting.
If you can devote the time and energy to dig deep into this subject and are determined to build such a battery and make it a success, I am the last person to try to stop you. However, to meet the devil in the detail requires your time and therefore your energy to be invested in something like this, which ties it up for other things. Therefore, it is not free, but conditional.
You have it yet not started, so I wonder why you already talk about an amount of energy you can get back from this is unlimited? How can you know in advance without testing it?
So, what you've got so far is a theory.
Now you go into the next phase, trial and error, to see, if the experiments always are having the same result. You compare your own results with those of other people, for example, doing the very same thing and you collect the data. You need for that a forum, a data base in which you can put your results and numbers and in which you can prove, for example, the degree of purity or the degree of composites of the metals you use, for example and many things more. You even might receive confusing results etc. etc.
If you are not interested in meeting challenging questions I wonder of what kind of an experimenter you are? It's the critique, the questions, the sceptic attitude which can be used to meet certain hinderances and thoughts yet not considered.
I will give you some more in the next comment, not to make this one too long.
Have you seen this yet? Earth Engine Model 30 Demonstration https://www.facebook.com/inductanceenergy/videos/earth-engine-model-30-demonstration/364455367543206/
APT4U | 'THE' Magnetic Micro Grid Earth Engine
He was using old recycled bits of metal and so can we. I used to deal in scrap so know how to recycle copper. Old wiring can be stripped quite easily to make copper wires.
The point of this whole post was to show we had free energy many times before on this realm but for some reason we always get 'reset' and the technology is taken away from us.
This earth battery IS simple enough for even me to have a go at.
Exactly right.
Looking forward to seeing your results!
I would love to see you doing it and documenting this experiment in a way people are able to understand. :)
It may sound harsh but I don't like to bother myself with "held back technology" but instead would like to see if what sounds nice in theory can be put into practice in an equal easy going way. I am acting a bit of an asshole to test the determination.
Well there's a distinct lack of determination on my part, more like lots of procrastination.......
We get our Offgrid electricity from this Jackery Solar charger and 100 watt Solar panel … it even generates power on a cloudy day.
Even In the rain.
Heating, cooling, refrigerator…
https://amzn.to/3Vc1Qhe
Nice! I looked at buying one of those a few months back when they started talking about power cuts here.
But then I discovered free energy! Which seems much more interesting to me.
I believe that by the end of next year I will be able to charge a similar looking battery from a bunch of metal in a hole in the ground. And my supply will run night and day.
That sounds awesome.
I’m pretty happy with my Jackery 240. Runs everything I need for $250
https://amzn.to/3tPppkb
Congratulations, your post has been curated by @dsc-r2cornell. You can use the tag #R2cornell. Also, find us on Discord
Felicitaciones, su publicación ha sido votada por @ dsc-r2cornell. Puedes usar el tag #R2cornell. También, nos puedes encontrar en Discord