Your posts never cease to amaze. Been looking into 'free energy' too but didn't find the earth battery on my travels. All the DIY things I found were far too technical for my liking yet it is so simple really.
RE: Moving forward into the past: old technology recycled & free energy for all (The Earth Battery explained)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Moving forward into the past: old technology recycled & free energy for all (The Earth Battery explained)
Appreciate your enthusiasm.
I really believe it is simple! And I can't wait to get started on experiments when we have our warm weather back.
@erh.germany's argument that the cost of production outweighs the end result (free energy forever) doesn't stack up for me. Especially in a world where everything is constantly recycled. We already have the metals! Now let's use them for something awesome...
Exactly. Also have you seen the stuff about old buildings being generators. If true then we have a lot of infrastructure already built in old cities.
Which they indeed are, very technical. Which would require this exact technical knowledge to apply them yourself. That is not easy at all and if someone really dives deep into the matter, he or she needs a lot of time for own knowledge gain through experimentation (trial and error) as well as other means (like money and space).
No, it's not simple. It's complicated. It only seems to be simple because whenever someone gives you results of his experiments he uses both knowledge and ready made devices from existing sources, all of which needed a high amount of energy to come into being.
Read my comment, and you'll see what I mean :)
Greetings to you
I feel like you are missing the point.
It is simple for the average person to create free energy in the world we live in today.
That's all I was getting at. Nothing more.
The average person is not an inventor but a user. So I would put it the other way around: It's the efforts of non average people, who deal with the specific, the detail, the peculiar. Of those, who despite ready available applications and networks don't let themselves hinder to re-invent something forgotten or held back.
For this, they needed and are/were dependent on the support of the average peoples - the moment you are capable of inventing or building such a device yourself, you're above average.
Let's play with the scenarios. Let's say you succeed and can now power a coffee maker or an egg boiler with the battery. Let's further assume that you also manage to supply other household appliances with energy. What then?
Would you release this into the world as a freely available blueprint based on your research, time and energy? Would you make the plans available here on the blog or elsewhere? Or provide a detailed video tutorial or several? You would have to expect that people who are not familiar with the subject would want to ask you technical questions, that a lot of people would want to take up your time if you, as the creator of this knowledge, were interested in disseminating it, wouldn't you?
So there are the following problems if you do not want to be the sole beneficiary of such a technology, but seek to share it with as many people as possible.
You may have built a finished battery yourself, but other people have to go through the same process that you have already gone through in order to imitate what you have done. What is easy for you to understand, such as a technical construction manual, the terms used in it, is not for others, complete laymen. For the ignorant to become amateurs and then professionals, it takes tutors, guidance, conversations, an exchange. Let's say, because you say that the thing works one hundred per cent, that every week you receive thirty or more enquiries about where in section A of the instructions this or that has to be done and how, because the person who has the instructions in front of them doesn't understand them properly. What do you do then? Do you say: I'm sorry, people, try it yourself until you succeed. I don't have time for you. Then the matter stands or falls with the intelligence of those who receive your instructions from you free of charge, doesn't it?
But then you still have a problem. If you release your knowledge as open source, what's to stop anyone from taking that manual and applying for a patent on it?
That would be theft of common property, but how would it be known that it was stolen? You can't, when you put it online, search all the patent offices on the planet to see if your manual has been patented somewhere, can you?
That would leave only local, word-of-mouth action, and even then you can't be sure that someone from your immediate environment won't release the whole thing into the online world.
To avoid these issues you might find that a manual is not the propper thing to spread it wide and far, and therefore, a ready made product shall be it. Then you are arriving where all modern technology arrived. If you want to have a ready product you need a production facility, lines, distributions, sales, retailers and all that jazz. You need capital and investment etc pp - to involve as many peoples as beneficiaries - who need not become experts but users of your application.
Of course, you can say that you don't want to set up something as a technical advisor yourself, where you gather a team of technical advisors to meet the many interested enquiries that would want to use such an energy source. But if no one does this on a relevant scale, such knowledge remains rather small-scale and therefore has an air of mystery because it has not arrived in the world of mass commerce.
Finally, to come back to the assumption that such plans disappeared somewhere in drawers and never saw the light of day again, my question would be why? If it were really possible to generate energy with such a small input and a minimal amount of materials, what would have stopped these conspirators from building and using it for themselves in the same way? Their houses, yachts, swimming pools etc. would all have to be powered by exactly that, wouldn't they? Because I would be pretty stupid if I had such knowledge not to use it, wouldn't I?
Having such an interesting secret and not telling anyone except an initiated circle is as unrealistic as it is improbable. You can't really keep such things under wraps because the curiosity, the powers of observation, the many opportunities of information leaks would be exploited.
But even if it were, a big secret, I would consider it irrelevant information, because if you actually feel your own enthusiasm and time and inventive spirit, nothing will stop you from starting from scratch and developing in it, if only you want it strongly enough. Someone who wants something will find ways to move towards it, someone who doesn't want something will find reasons to talk his way out of it or to fall into hopelessness or displeasure.
David LaPoint did exactly what you are asking for back in 2019... He has documented and Open Sourced all his discoveries for anyone to build themselves... this way he does not have to fight the system that would try to stop, or kill him if he competed with big oil.
The Primer Fields Part 3
Do YOU have a 3 D Printer...??? Print one of THESE and BLURT about it~!
PrimerCube
I would love to build one of these if I had a 3D Printer... since it is Open Source and Free to Build~!
The PrimerCube is a revolutionary health enhancement device that utilizes a uniquely structured ionic field.
Website where you can download 3D Printer plans for free. https://primercube.org/
So cool providing me with that video "The Primer Fields Part 3"
I found it to be very interesting and I appreciated the pace and the repetitions in it, so I was more able to follow the explanations of what photons are and how they "behave" and this field theory. It's for students, I guess. I never fully grasped the slit experiment but this one gave it a really good go and I give you many many thanks for that!
It reminded me also a bit of some of the Startrek episodes where they talk "it's out of phase" and stuff like that. The editors must have had so much fun writing the scenes.
Anyway, this very scientific footage gave me a lot of inspiration and I am motivated to use what it has left me with for a text or a story, I am yet undecided where to post it.
For the rest:
I remain being a nuisance in pointing out that the latest video of Mr. LaPoint is two years old where he promises to give more footage of "how to generate energy" but not with what design he showed having in his studio but with something else. It remains being on the hold.
The primer cube is not much of interest to me. I just briefly checked the website and found the manual in order to build that thing oneself. It confirms what I already expressed here, that things are not easy to build and that you have to have quite some knowledge and skills in, for example, basic mathematics, physics or chemistry and also in using your hands to complete a device on your own.
I think you have to put into perspective that David is a '1 man show' who has released everything he can as 'Open Source' while the whole time being scorned & ridiculed by most of the 'Establishment Science Horde' and he is also being shadow banned to keep his information from going viral... He walks a difficult and dangerous path that many others have been murdered for.
It is a device that is said to be healing. The open source is for the cube, not for some energy generating device. There are countless of these in the world and forgive me if I am not interested in such things because I do not believe in singular devices or properties that promise me health.
How I think about it, is Human beings are too complex for that, the dynamics of psyche and physique cannot really be brought to a point, i.e. simple cause-and-effect mechanisms. As far as I'm concerned, all people can buy it or copy it and be happy with it.
Will you personally copy it? Have you seen the long list of materials needed? Or will you buy it?
In 1910 John D Rockefeller & Andrew Carnagie became MAJOR investors of Big Oil & Big Pharma. They banned the medical field from acknowleding the existence of energy in the body & the use of electromagnetic healing because there's no money cures & healthy ppl. Being founders of Big Oil, the Rockefellers pushed petrolium based drugs on the public for TREATMENT to keep them coming back. $$$
To help push the indoctrination forward, John D. Rockefeller gave more than $100 million to schools, colleges & hospitals & he founded a philanthropic front group called "General Education Board". ANY schools & hospitals that did NOT adopt the BS fake science of the Rockefeller's would NOT get funding & thus, would close down.
John D Rockefeller & Andrew Carnagie founded Big Pharma that props up our current world.
Nikola Tesla, Charles Proteus Steinmetz, Faraday, Maxwell, Heavyside & many others who built 100 percent of the CURRENT electric grid & our entire modern world, collectively agreed that magnetism, static electricity & electricity governs our world & universe. They tried to teach us this over 100 years ago. Their science was swept under the rug to be hidden from us by corrupt, evil people & Einstein, a man who literally invented NOTHING, was forced upon us by these very evil people to throw humanity off the trail of true metaphysics of the universe.
We need to dig out the teachings of Nikola Tesla, Charles Proteus Steinmetz & others to relearn absolutely EVERYTHING about energy's true role in our own biology & the biology of our Earth & universe.
Magnetism is NOT taught to us correctly & its origin is NOT in the metal on your refrigerator. It's a neat ATTRIBUTE of magnetism, but it's not its primary function.
Think of healing using LIGHT. Light is NOT a particle. It's an electro-magnetic coaxeal circuit. Light IS an electrical phenomenon. SO ARE YOU!
👇👇👇
☝️☝️☝️