"Does that mean Zapata will have an easier time listing considering it is keeping all stake intact?"
This was my market assumption from talking to connections in the media and industry, specifically at exchanges, they liked the story, but we missed the opportunity how things ended up playing out.
Now if/when Zapata ever launches, it will likely be a fork of Blurt that I myself will build a team around and take to market in a very aggressive and strategic way.
"On another note Bittrex is getting sued by some of the current Hive guys and I wouldn't be surprised if bittrex wants nothing more to to do with things relating to steem/hive/blurt/zapata..."
I've tried to cultivate a good relationship with Bittrex over the years, or as good as it can be for a crypto BD professional tied to multiple projects like me.
I thought zapata was a fork of steem with a snapshot taken at the same time as blurt?
It was supposed to launch as such but was delayed due to technical difficulty with Blurt and now we are not certain when it will launch or what the economics will look like as that market opportunity seems to have passed us by.
If it is going to be a fork of blurt, then it won't include the steemit,inc stake by default, correct?
I want to do a minnow fork of Blurt and cap all accounts at 33k and/or something to target and reward active users on Blurt.
I see. Looks like there is some discord among the founders? Difference of opinion on direction?
Long story. I'm a (Non Managing) Founder of Blurt.
What's with the comments about you quiting and then not quiting and then quiting again etc?
It was a mess. Zapata launching was a resolution to the whole mess which I mostly created by quitting Blurt but Graphene Zapata never launched. We are looking at other opportunities now and happy Blurt exists as such.