Whatever I understood from the behavior of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Bashar Sahib,

Whatever I understood from the behavior of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Bashar Sahib,

1. He considered Syed Abul A'la Maududi Sahib to be the Imam of Aqeedah and considered him the standard of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'at. So in no way will he go beyond his aqeedah. Even if he does not admit it, his actions and behavior point to this reality.
2. He does not understand the meaning of the term we call the Companions Mi'are Haq. It's not unusual to start refuting something without fully understanding it.

1. He does not understand whether an individual Sahabi is called Mi'are Haq or the Sahaba in congregation, whether each individual action is called Mi'are Haq or a collective position, what are the areas of Mi'are Haq and what is its position in the light of Sharia.
2. Posting post after post about me on Facebook won't go away, but in no way does he agree to sit in a virtual meeting. However, if he is sitting face to face virtually, is he feeling any unknown fear and if he posts post after post in this way, he is getting some secret benefit? This is strange and funny. What can be said from behind, where is the problem to say face to face? Posting and counter-posting like this never gets resolved. If the negotiators do not change their position later, if there is a face-to-face discussion, everyone's position is clear in front of the nation and it is easy to understand which side is relatively stronger.

1. A group of blind followers wants to turn the issue into a party conflict. May Allah guide them. Al Wala Wal Bara is for Allah. Deen will be the criterion of friendship and enmity. Love will be for religion; Not for the party. And if religion is restricted within the party, it will open the door of Khareji sedition. Therefore, by inciting members of the party, concealing ideological differences between two individuals and inciting everyone against a particular individual is ignorance of the highest level. Dreaming of Deen Qayyim does not befit Jahili behavior by a person. And if they declare themselves as people of a different religion, then there will be nothing left to say. Because, the kind of behavior that is expected if the religion is the same, surely it will not be compatible to expect the same kind of behavior if the religion is different.

1. It is better if Maulana Saheb clears it if he does not agree to sit with me virtually for some reason. You are a senior person. Your service for religion is also recognized. I am much younger than you. For this reason, if there is hesitation to sit face to face, then what is the reason for not hesitating to post after post? And if age does not matter in scholarly review, as was the principle of the Imams, then where is the problem in sitting face to face on a neutral platform? Clear the matter.

source
This is my last call. But if you don't agree to sit, then I will answer your every doubt in live video. Since it is a matter of belief, it is also my moral duty. And in that case there will be nothing to do even if the language and vocabulary become difficult. It is also my weakness. I wanted fixes and simple solutions; But you seem to be complicating the matter unnecessarily. If you take your time and answer instead of sitting face to face, do you get the opportunity to get help from different people and prepare mentally by studying? If the answer is 'yes', then the reason for hiding is obvious. And if the answer is 'no', then the matter will be considered a lack of courage.