My reply to @chibuzorwisdom.....

Here is my original comment:

@blurtwardens support people who make quality and original contents on blurt.

NO...YOU...DON'T
You support people who:

Do not question 'the authority' of blurt large stakeholders/foundation, who 'go along to get along'....
The so called 'whitelist' - is nothing more than a blacklist for the politically correct to claim plausible deniability - I.e 'trying to be clever'.
Those with an IQ over 90 can see through this very, very clearly - and all it shows is the pettiness, and fragile ego's at play.
(and illustrates how those who think they are 'being a bit clever', are the total opposite - it's fucking embarrassing !).

It's a showcase of the mentality - and childishness - of how blurt operates - and how nepotistic and insular looking it really is.
It acts as a showcase to put off intelligent investors who would wish to support a dynamic, free speech, and open social media, blockchain.

This is the reply, and my response to the points raised...

Thank you for the response.
You are a good writer, I do vote some of your post but I do not find it enthusiastic to reply any of your post or comments.
This is because I see you as someone that can easily insult people while trying to communicate an appreciable idea. I also see you as someone who has great positive energy but prefer benefiting from bad energy.

Do you think wisdom is shown by not understanding the message and instead, focussing on the style of the message?

Do you you think it is very wise to expect the messenger to take into account all other peoples individual, deep psychological landscapes, and pander to each ?...or is it best to deliver the message on the premise that the message will be heard and dissected properly by those with
A/the necessary IQ ?
B/ The necessary intellectual maturity ?
C/ The necessary emotional maturity ?
Do you think for blurt, it is wiser to promote good writers over poor ones – irrelevant of the message style?

Do you think it shows good leadership to try and freeze my account (@blurtbooster founder!) because my messages – ones of philosophical rigor, and sound reasoning - offended those with fragile ego's?

Do you think this sends a good message to people looking at blurt platform? (either from a potential investors perspective or an individual who wishes to blog ?).

I also see you as someone who has great positive energy but prefer benefiting from bad energy.

How you choose to see me is your responsibility.

I'm not responsible for how you choose to decipher my words.
That is your responsibility.
You are 100% wrong in your assertions of how you see me – that is your perspective, based on your own psychological landscape – it has nothing to do with me.
If you care to delve deeper in to my material of 5 years on the block chain, (increased wisdom through understanding), you will be able to see where your perspective is in error.

Have you ever wondered what a newbie will think of blurt if your anti-blurt comments where what he first saw on arrival?

I'm not anti-blurt – that is how YOU choose to frame my comments.

I am critical of 'the leaderships' juvenile approach to business, the flawed governance model that shows itself to be digital feudalism, and the future (dire) prospects of blurt, based on the two reasons I've just given.

You think that's it's better to not tell the truth ?

(that would indicate a desire to want to intentionally misrepresent a product).

There is nothing I say that cannot be backed up by sound reasoning, written evidence of things stated by others and a simple understanding of basic psychology

Do you know that a lot of people are actively posting on blurt because of blurtbooster, primeradue, mmmk and ctime supportive upvotes?
Yet you call blurtbooster recent form of selecting its beneficiaries political and a blacklist.

This is because it is political, and the blacklist is called a white list so as to be able to claim plausible deny-ability.

While the people executing this policy may think they are ' being a bit clever' by using such childish, silly strategies – they really aren't – it's quite the opposite. (anyone with an IQ over 100 and some experience in political science and strategy - and sophist practices - will be able to quite clearly see what's going on).

Only people with no understanding of how those with a fragile ego's work would not see it for what it is.
(when said ego's are in 'a positions of power' to exert 'retribution' over those who have caused them narcissistic harm - to protect the fragile ego - the observable actions, or attempted actions - are clear for everyone to see).

Top business tip - - People with such fragile ego's are the worst people to have in leadership roles.

You may not see it - for whatever reason - but anyone who is wishing to look, and who possesses the minimum of cognitive ability, can discern the patterns to see the reality of the situation.

If you have questions, you ask rather than creating chaos to gain attention and upvotes.

'Creating chaos' - just by bringing up points ? On my on blog and in comments?
This statement goes some way to explain your own psychological landscape (and personality traits).

Your assumptive statement above, regarding the motivation behind my style of posting, says far more about your own internal landscape, than mine.
(assumptive statements are never a wise tactic, unless the intention is sophistry - and that my friend, is ALWAYS a very bad idea when conversing with me).

Do you see the above paragraphs as 'insulting' you – if so, why?

Let me tell you...(not my hypothesis, this is well known and generally agreed upon)

IF SO, then ….something within my words caused your ego to recoil at my words.
Something within your subconscious found them irritating, annoying, anger inducing, etc.
It is then expressed outwards, in the form of 'being offended', or 'insulted'.
(it's the ego trying it's best to protect you from what it sees as potential danger – whether it's correct or not is irrelevant at the time of 'feeling insulted').

HOW YOU CHOOSE to interpret my words is entirely dependent on YOUR own internal landscape, and has ZERO to do with me.

Or do you think I should be responsible for YOUR emotional responses, and well-being?

(see 'C/' on the list above, regarding emotional maturity).

Although my explanations may not mean anything to you but I need you to understand that blurtbooster was initially voting everything on blurt before adopting its white list model to curb abusers and plagiarists.

My posts are all original content, and never plagiarised.
I do not spam.

All I can say to you is this....
It is unwise for anyone to take part in things that go against his values as an individual.

Do you think that is a very wise comment?

Seriously?
You think it unwise for individuals to 'take part' in a pedophile rings with the goal of bringing down the sick fucks?

Do you think it unwise to partake in a communist, collectivist regime, so as to be able to bring it crashing down from the inside through subversion ?

Do you think it unwise to put your own individual, personal values on hold for the benefit of bigger issues ?

By your own rationale, you think it unwise to kill someone who is killing, because you - as an individual- is against killing ?

If you ever wish to engage in principles, philosophy and ethics with me, feel free.

(but better put your big boy pants on -intellectual maturity - and expect a bruising if you're gonna posit such 'wisdoms' as you've just done above).

You paint blurt black yet you stay to benefit from the united developmental effort of its team and investors.

I paint collectivism as evil, stupid , cowardly and pathetic.

You do not not know how I benefit from blurt.
(you will, when the time is right).

As @out-of-the-matrix pointed out - we all have our own paths.

Collectivism is not my path, nor will ever be.
I'll leave that sick ideology to the insecure mob , the sociopaths with control fantasies, and those who are too scared to be sovereign individuals, and would prefer serfdom.

I am benefiting greatly from taking part in 5 years of DpoS...

As a wise person once said – The only true wealth you can ever hold is knowledge, experience, and integrity.
My 'wealth balance' rises daily with blurt.
(steem and hive before).

If blurt and it's team management where as bad as I have seen you paint them over the last two years, Then you wouldn't still be here posting.

Again, you are expressing your own assumptions and then drawing incorrect conclusions – this is not wisdom, matey..
.
My motivations are very different than the ones that you've constructed as a reality in your own head.
.. (to 'assume' is to make an 'ass' out of 'u' , and of 'me'? - an old saying).

The earlier you start promoting blurt with this your big energy, the better it will be for all of us because a man that lives in a glass house does not throw stones

What would be MY INCENTIVE to promote blurt?
'money'?...lolololololol...

'all of us'?.. Who is this 'all of us?'...'the collective' that works against me?...
Yeah, that's some incentive...

IDEA!

I will do a funny post of what NOT to do in marketing blurt.

(my years of successful sales and marketing do not come cheap)
If you don't find it humorous , again – refer to your own internal psychology and ask yourself 'why not?'.
(it's normally something to do with a fragile ego or unresolved childhood trauma - they are connected).

Blurt is striving for greateness lately, some promoters are currently supporting people with both liquid Blurt and upvotes.
I advice you to stop calling blurtbooster white list a blacklist and support the effort of people who are trying to help retain users here.

I will call it whatever I feel like calling it.
I will support authentic people,like @squirrelbait, @yayagerado, @small1axe, and others.

I may not reply you again unless I see a peaceful and pragmatic comment.

I don't write with conditions attached, unless paid to (like my script writing services or 'erotica to order').

What you see as peaceful, is a subjective term.
It's not wise to try and project subjective definitions onto others – being subjective and all that.
To include caveats (peaceful, pragmatic), is you (trying to) exercise a control drama.

@lucylin – does not react well to control drama's – may bite if anyone is silly enough to go down the route of playing linguistic, psychological shenanigans, with him.

I am not part of blurt team but a volunteer to the blurt warden services and I appreciate doing my work diligently to help blurt growth and curb abusers of the block chain.
My opinions about you are personal based on how long I have been seeing your post and not incited.
Thank you for understanding.

Than YOU my friend, for giving blurt and its readers, the opportunity to see things for what they are, more clearly.

(whether that was your intention, I don't know).

It has been of great value.
Cheers.

Oh, top tips:

If you think the wardens COAL list saying is 'a bit clever', or funny – it really isn't.

We are the Blurt Wardens. We enforce the COAL (Collaboratively Organised Abuse List).

Naughty children get lumps of COAL in their stockings for Xmas! :)

It has psychological overtones of wanting to adopt a parent role, and thus, seeing blurt users as nothing more than children to be guided and/or punished.

I'd change it, if I were you...

The very same way that I'd change that very dubious, pedo predatory, overtoned, AI blonde with a phallic symbol on blurt blog landing page...

P.S
I'm helping blurt more than 90% of users, just by pointing these silly, basic, 'schoolboy errors' out to you.
You're welcome.

Imagine what I could do if I were 'on blurts side'?

I did offer to be an ambassador for blurt, btw - on my first discussions with @megadrive.

He finished that talk with 'enjoy your time on blurt' – just before then attempting to COAL list me/ account freeze me, etc....

Fragile ego's....white lists...blah blah – embarrassing for anyone to observe and very self destructive for those who continue to let their ego's run their world.... (in more ways than I will go into here - that's a 6,000 word post just on it's own)

Cheers matey !

---

_{Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org}