A quick question...
Would the 6 people that actually read my material, prefer to see any 'longer' replies that I make on my feed - rather than lost in a comments section that nobody reads much ?
...as always, your inputs are more than welcome.
@blurtbooster - you would think that those accounts that get the most interactions would be the one to be promoted the most, wouldn't you ?
Hint: my posts receive more interactions than any other account on blurt....
...just sayin'
" Oh, for fucks sake, will @lucylin stop pointing out those common sense things?...He's making us, the really clever people, look like fragile ego'd, total friggin' idiots...
Here's @yayogerardo 's comment....
How do you know when honest posts are looked down upon on blurt?
When ze lidas refuse to put you on ze white list, when ze lidas intend to freeze your assets, when ze lidas mute you, when ze lidahs hate etc, etc.
...and here's my reply...
What I find truly hysterical, is that self-evident truths get the response they do - by the so called 'those in positions of power'.
Do they really think hopium, libtarded ideology, ' the force of DPoS will' and word salads, will defend them against the reality of the situation?
Hysterical.
I wonder if it's ever occurred to 'them'...
...'Maybe we should change the entire model, and voluntary give up our positions 'of powerrr' to let those who are competent in commercial matters, run things - and thus increase the potential for earning more money via an increased token price, based on basic free market principles?
Nah, who am I kidding....?..Fragile ego's would never give up power voluntarily - it's their time in the sun!...(it's just a shame that what their ego's hear as adulation, is actually the sound of 'the thinking people's', embarrassed groans..)
....'Oh shit, he's gonna mention that whitelist, again'...
CAVEAT:
This perspective is from the basis of it being a social media platform (you, know, the very selling point of the entire project), and not a ponzi-eqsue, wealth transfer to those who created the system*.
*I am not saying this was an intentional consequence - i.e an intended outcome. (that would be fraudulent).
Why do I say this?...
I don't know this- I may be wrong .... but I don't think the psychological landscape of those involved is one of criminality. Naivety, yes, criminal, no.
Unfortunately the naivety + fragile ego's of those involved - will not allow them to admit that they created a fucked up system that has little appeal to those who love free speech, free markets, and relish in the arena of competition and not incompetent nepotistic practices, that are nothing more than a race to the bottom - collectivism...
.
..Bless..
IF it IS nothing more than a financial product to trade against other crypto currencies, for profit - then what I've written above, means nothing...
