I have never liked the idea that someone has the edge on presenting others posts as curation. It seems like the old saying " Those who can't DO.. TEACH".
Do us all a favor.. stop acting like somehow you will create a curation trail and somehow help these authors get exposure. Who the fugg asked you? What knowledge of said curation subject do YOU have that OTHERS DO NOT? You know who else wants to curate content for others.. the GOVERNMENTS OF THE NWO. They would love yo put exposure on the things they deem worthy while burying the info they are afraid of.
Just do YOu.
Communities are great.
Curation accounts or projects are a farce. Basically yall copy n paste others posts into yours and then act that by somehow you POSTING OTHERS CONTENT is gonna help them. Don't be a lying little bitch.. you just want a cut of others work without having to create original content. This has big one of the biggest unspoken about leeching activities on our social blockchain adventures since steem.
GET REAL
Make your own shit!!
HOW ABOUT YOU JUST REBLOGG INSTEAD OF ACTING LIKE FOR SOME REASON YOU DESERVE REWARDS FOR OTHER PEOPLES WORK
cu·ra·tion
[kyəˈrāSHən]
NOUN
the action or process of selecting, organizing, and looking after the items in a collection or exhibition:
"the curation of the exhibition was informed by my experience as an artist"
the selection of performers or performances that will feature in an arts event or program:
"I had a chance to talk with a fellow musician about the festival's curation"
the selection, organization, and presentation of online content, merchandise, information, etc., typically using professional or expert knowledge:
"curation of online content that is relevant to your business can be an excellent way to drive SEO"
Most CURATORS are just reward hungry people who can't actually produce something worthy to claim as theirs IMO.
It gives a false sense of community support IMO
#GrowYourSelf
Agreed ,. and curating on only a common tag like music or art , with or without blurt in front ,.. can make one , with lot's of power , function as a filter on hot and trending , like a centralized point that decides who get's support to show up in the top 10 post's or first page of the tag .
It's how the whole thing is set up ,.. to keep control by power of a elite small group . Not necessarily a bad thing on it's self , but as always wide open for corruption , hate , greed and envy to grow on and destroy it .
So when curation is a to powerful tool compared to creating original content we might wanna bring some balance to that situation . Changing the 50/50 ratio is to me the first thing that comes to mind ,.. 20/80 might do the trick , who knows . ;-)
Anyone can just list what they vote on their own publications too. Its just a matter of time before bots can put that all together in a neat way and just have it displayed post by post instead of humans having to write it out.
Literally an app that can do all that.l is even possinle these days. Though its costs would be great. But if that is not a problem then hell go for it.
Re🤬eD
Fire literally EVERYONE!
Sometimes I'm too slow to get things. lol I'm getting you now a bit. I remember when I hated that in steem and starting asking them to not comment me at least. But sometimes I really understand people, especially those who are not getting that much support, for them even little tiny upvote is like a heaven. That's why we may do things otherwise. That's why I'm inviting people to @blurtcast where that will be exposed at least in a video that may promote blurt on youtube.