China has simply erased the state of Israel from its maps!😲

in blurtlife •  last year 

maxresdefault.jpg

There is a well-known saying that even the most peaceful person cannot live in peace if it disturbs his neighbor! For this and other reasons, I always warn that - if there is a conflict - it is of crucial importance which parties could interfere, which interests are still opposed, what the surrounding countries and allies actually have to say, etc., as these are things that have always been of crucial importance in such situations and will always be important in the future!

Anyone who studies history knows that such situations in the world are basically nothing new, but I noticed something here in an article from "report24.news" that I find very strange and also disturbing, which is why I would like to take this opportunity to point it out.

EXTRACT: "Two of the largest Chinese tech companies - Baidu and Alibaba - have effectively erased Israel from their maps. Although the borders are still shown, the name of the country has been removed. A direct nod from Beijing to Tel Aviv?"🤔

EXTRACT2: "In recent weeks, the People's Republic of China has been demonstratively neutral as far as the current Israel-Hamas conflict is concerned. However, Beijing's geostrategic considerations (also with regard to the "New Silk Road") make the Islamic world appear more important than little Israel, which is already a close ally of the United States. While the communist government continues to call on the parties to the conflict to show moderation, it appears that only some pressure is being exerted on Tel Aviv via proxies."

sddefault.jpg

EXTRACT3: " The largest search engine in the People's Republic, Baidu, has erased the name Israel from its online maps, as has the e-commerce giant Alibaba. Although you can still find the country's borders, the cities of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, there are no longer any indications that this is the state of Israel, which is largely recognized by the international community. Major US media outlets such as the Wall Street Journal are already criticizing this enormously."

Wall Street Journal: "When Hamas attacked Israel on October seventh of this year, killing over 1400 Israelis, including Jewish children who were burned alive and Jewish babies whose heads were cut off, the Chinese Communist Party responded with calls for a cease-fire and peace talks. 'To end the vicious circle between Palestine and Israel, it is imperative to resume peace talks, implement the two-state solution and fully and properly resolve the Palestinian issue through political means,' Mao Ning, spokeswoman for the Foreign Ministry, said in a statement two days after the attack."

Of course, there was a two-state solution and there have already been a number of recognition processes that could have taken place if the parties on both sides had really wanted it, but instead preferred to sabotage this solution and make it seem unrealistic in today's world, even if a few dreamers are still desperately clinging to these hopeless plans.

sddefault.jpg

EXTRACT2: "The Chinese state media is also taking the side of Hamas and the Palestinians. The China Daily newspaper, for example, declared in an editorial that the United States was "on the wrong side of history" with regard to the Gaza Strip and sharply criticized Washington for "blindly supporting Israel": "Without the approval of Beijing's state censors, such an article would not have appeared."

At this point I have to say in China the articles don't just appear without the government's permission, because even in this country what is said or allowed to be said by the major media has to be politically correct. Don't we know that too? Not officially, of course, as Western countries don't have to march along in absolute politically correct lockstep, but unofficially, since 2020 at the latest (keyword: fake pandemic), even the last sheeple🐏🐑 have realized what to make of the crumbling façade of the fake democracy that prevails in these latitudes.

China can probably be credited with the fact the government at least doesn't put on a cheap show in this respect and lets normal citizens know that they only have to obey! Because of the open dictatorship, it is said of course also more direct and open there whether and to what extent interference in articles is permitted and on which topics it is better for the health of editors and journalists to either be loyal to the line or, alternatively, not to write about them at all.

72295894_2113911005583571_1860372312692359168_n.jpg

As this conflict, with its many influential players, affects the entire global community, it is naturally worrying what is going on here, so it can also be said quite clearly that the willingness to escalate on all sides has reached its peak so far and we can only continue to observe how this situation, which is dangerous for us all, will develop in the future.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  last year  ·  

Interesting but A drawing doesnt hurt much in an already insane disturbance.
all this is just a veil anyway.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·  

I hope so.

  ·  last year  ·  

Well if up to me i would erase all states from the world map , including China .
State , any state , is the real evil in the world , for ever has bin , for ever will be .
I stand with the people , the good people misguided and oppressed by state nations , always suffering and at the low end .
FUCK THE NWO ,. i am the New Free World .
Stateless a inhabitant of this world .

;-)


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·   (edited)

I am rather skeptical, because as nice as the idea of a free world may be, a stateless world government from which you cannot flee like from a terrible state from which you are protected in another, such a globally ruling government would be my worst horror scenario.

  ·  last year  ·  

Your not skeptical , you are confused by your statist mind .
New Free World ,. not One World Government .
In the New Free World we are al individuals taking care of our own without interference of any state or government . The New Free World is based on the non violent voluntairyist principles where all interaction between people must be voluntary without any forced ruling by a third party of governance in any way . Every individual has it's own private capital to work from ,. being knowledge , skills and reputation ,. where reputation is very important in the New Free World ,. like a bad reputation will get you nowhere , everybody will avoid you , and there will be no state or government around to help you by forcing people to work with you anyway .

A person with a good reputation will be able to learn skills and gain knowledge from his local community . In the New Free World local community's are the way , non violent peaceful existence for local we all know each other . Have a look at the free city's project witch is based in non violent voluntairyist principles . Montelibero , Liberland and Liberstad are good examples and all have there own little differences . Get the fact that we need rulers out of your head , for we do not need them . A person can only rule over his private property and never beyond .

such a globally ruling government would be my personal horror scenario.

I second that ,. worst horror ever to me to .
;-)


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·  

I support all of that👍 but I could only celebrate it when this state has already been successfully achieved, whereas before that I hope that the NWO will not be sold under the guise of the "free world" in the hope that we will only realize what is being played when it is already too late.

By the way, thanks for the hint, the error has already been corrected.🙂

  ·  last year  ·  

a stateless world government

A state is a criminal organization who by the threat of violence claim rights and set rules over individuals private property's . In short government by a state .

By that logic there can never exist something like a stateless world government. A one world government will be a one world state .
Your correction made me laugh a bit , like still a bit confused there . No problem , it is not easy to break your own programming done true many years .

To be sure the NWO OWG is not sold under the lie being the New Free World , the voluntairyist non violent anarchist movement has already claimed this name ,. the New Free World , witch clearly opposes the NWO one world government . If you hope and wait you will end up in the NWO one world government for sure . For yes they will bring it as your save >free< place to vote for . While the New Free World will never ask for any kind of vote from anybody at all . There will be no global democracy socialism nationalism or communism in the New Free World . Local community's may choose any system they please ,. but never expand this by force to other community's . So community's with democratic socialist nationalist or communist systems may still exist , for it is a Free World , but have to keep there system private and for there own property and people only .

To achieve this New Free World one just has to support the Free private city movement . Montelibero Liberstad Liberland any many others are based on non violent voluntairyist anarchy , while Christiania Denmark is a social anarchist communist community ,. al good as long as we respect each others ways and do not judge each other to on the base we stand on . There can even be trade between those different community's . Aldo i won't know what a communist community would have to trade for , as the F in communism stands for Food . But trading our food with them for empty baskets and pots might be profitable for both party's .

How to be sure a greedy community will not take over an other by force ,. the right to protect your own property , and city's of like minded will be well connected to , so a community with a bad reputation will have a very hard time to trade .

I welcome everyone to the New Free World .
(witch really ain't that new at al , we al lived like that many ages ago)
;-)



Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org