Give your children the gift of immunity - sneeze on them!

in blurthealth •  4 years ago 

This is a new research paper from 11th Nov.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19545-8

“Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in three children of parents with symptomatic COVID-19”

I will try to rewrite this properly but this is a comment I made on another site.

Please read through the whole Results section of the paper.

I quote just one small section:
“Our combined salivary and serological findings show that, despite having no virological evidence of infection, all three children developed antibody responses against various SARS-CoV-2 epitopes. Of the three children, C3, who remained asymptomatic throughout, demonstrated the most robust antibody response.”

Nowhere… nowhere do the researchers make the most obvious conclusion. The kids have antibodies but no (alleged) virus. They especially have antibodies in their mucus and saliva, the first line of defence. How can that be?

Maybe, just maybe, they got them from their parents!!

” This potential key role for mucosal antibodies in protection warrants confirmation in larger studies.” That’s it! That’s their lame conclusion.

Part of natural immunity comes from sharing saliva, even from a sneeze, so that, yes, you may get a virus but you also get the antibodies, and in many people those antibodies trigger a wider immune response before the virus has a chance.

This is similar to how convalescent antibody therapy works, except in this case it is from blood plasma. Antibodies don’t seem to attack each other.

I’m still astonished, I’ve read through the paper again and the authors willfully, and almost contemptuously, refuse to state the obvious conclusion.

Because that would open up the whole scam.

And yet the data is there – the proof is there!

Take that mask off and sneeze out loud!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Physical distancing precautions were not feasible in the household. Child 3 had particularly close contact, sleeping in the parents’ bed throughout the period both parents were unwell. All family members recovered fully without requiring medical care.

and

Of the three children, C3, who remained asymptomatic throughout, demonstrated the most robust antibody response. We also observed that symptom resolution in A2, C1, and C2 coincided with a spike in salivary anti-S1 IgA, but not IgG

mmm... what conclusions can we draw?

What conclusions must we avoid at all costs?

I'd be asking who looked after the kids while parents were away and what did they feed them. The parents were obviously hungover and exhausted from partying and mixing with family (stressful). The kids may also have had a good time while the parents were away or the opposite and really missed them. More stress. No viruses needed to explain all the illnesses at all but there is a lack of real interesting data in this scenario.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

You seem to have missed the point. Never mind.

You mean the point about the immune system? There is no such thing as an 'immune' system.