So I have you muted and only came to know about this post because I was asked to intervene.
This is quite serious, you are accusing someone of wishing you death, that is highly inflammatory and defamatory, am not sure which comment @opidia's made you think that, I found one that uses the word "soon".
https://blurt.blog/deutsch/@opidia/r84jvj
You are a sick man , God will show you the way , soon .
Now God has throughout history punished in many ways, many are not death, so that is quite a big stretch to infer that. This is the problem I have, I don't actually have desire to fight with you and don't mind leaving you to your own thing, but when you start creating panic and drama that is not necessary that is a problem, even my drone post would have been forgotten if you just handled it diplomatically instead of creating a huge urgent panic and twisted it to make me into this war monger where all I wanted to do was make a difference in the war effort, anyone who knows me knows I am not like that. When I make drama about you in return, you don't like it do you?
Here again is more panic, making the community think someone in our midst wishes death on people, also I am not a fan of how everyone who disagrees with you suddenly gets debased and dehumanised to creature level, and use your pub to make outcasts of them as done to @tanweeralam @jaki01 @afrog @tomoyan, myself and now @opidia and likely many others.
in this post
https://blurt.blog/blurtgerman/@double-u/closed
you say things like the following, where you could just say hey I really didn't want to go to his house of fears of getting covid, rather than saying "Corona-filthy pad". The word creature is used 4 times to describe him.
Mr. "stick in the ass". afrog always points his flag to his advantage. If I had just kept voting him, I would have stayed the best whale of all time. afrog and I live in the same town, and I haven't seen this creature and its character for about 40 years.
But under no circumstances did I want to enter his Corona-filthy pad
There is no point in wasting any more words on this pathetic creature afrog.
You also refer to @opidia as a creature in this post in addition to allegations of wishing you death.
And I was publicly wished death by this creature soon.
Regarding self-voting I actually don't care if people vote self 100% all the time, it's a free world, but it would not be very sociable and you may not reap the full community-building benefits of being part of Blurt. The blockchain doesn't enforce no selfvoting and as such is not illegal, even if it were illegal people would then self-vote with alt accounts, so the only thing that works is a Diversity index. The only time I do care about self-votes is if someone or a group of people pretend to be righteous and demonise and label others who do while they themselves are doing the same in a hypocritical manner, albeit manually as the only difference.
From this comment, I don't expect to achieve much, except I do hope that users on the platform can get a bit more dignity and not be labelled creatures and other debasing words.
I wish you well wherever you may go and may not see your reply or even respond to it.
Before you have not answered the remaining 16 pages of my post from Sunday, which mainly concern your lies and your aggressive and attacking behavior, I see no reason to respond substantively to the text passages that you have also translated very incorrectly/badly.
I think the whole point of blurt is we all are allowed the freedom to do the things we believe are ok to do and if we don’t like it we just don’t vote. If people want to make up specific rules based on personal beliefs of a few rich people it’s just hive. The WHOLE point of this platform is it’s decentralised. You can’t like decentralisation when it fits with your beliefs but hate it when it doesn’t.
Well said...
This is also why blurt is going to be a huge success. It's simple and basic structure will allow for the consensus of the community take effect.
The answer to many issues here is not voting and not supporting behavior you don't approve of.
Instead of having a central authority like the "Hive Satanic Cabal" implementing their opinions and beliefs down upon everyone else while punishing those who disagree or disobey.
exactly I notice people love decentralisation when it agrees with their rules then don't like it when it doesn't lol thats really not decentralisation. Decentralisation can't be fully fair because some people will have more money so they can obviously manipulate any system, whilst humans want to continue doing so but the other systems can actually punish you and make it so you cannot engage in society at all if you don't follow their particular rules or ideas on what is 'good' / 'bad'. If we take hive as an example most of the things they told others off for doing they were doing themselves anyways haha like multiple accounts, cross voting, using steemit through fake accounts etc. At least when something is decentralised although sure, large holders can influence slightly they cannot silence people, rob from them or make it so they cannot trade due to an opinion.
Hive was very very dark energy I kept there because I had people I really liked and had spent years building that community and didn't really want to be forced to leave it because of a select few but then I realised I was just giving them all money essentially by engaging in the platform and went out in a blaze of glory. Notice all of them have little cartoon characters whilst we are all there completely transparent. It triggered the shit out of me lol and I feel just so much better cutting the chord completely I don't even log in beyond the wallet now I just don't want to see it. Since blurt came along at least we have options and we can focus on this and build it as a community that supports everyone and is fair.
Personal dramas are boring. As long as you were arguing about the visions and the future of Blurt blockchain, I was on the side of double-u, because he sees what I see - the need for change. Unfortunately, you both switched to the personal level. However, I'm intrigued by the phrase "Diversity Index" in this comment. Do you have any systematic solution in mind that would fix the current unfair allocation of the reward pool?
@rycharde has been playing with this concept of adapting the rewards pool to benefit those who vote more widely, but we may try first to collate data on a rockdb or mongodb database and then create a UI leaderboard of most diverse voters as POC.
Regarding the drama, it has affected the growth of blurt because everytime we issue a new feature it is demonised, even some people didnt like avatars, i mean wtf. At some point we wouldnt develop anymore if no one appreciates it.
how do you propose we quantify a "wise" vote ?
Don't have any idea though! But give me time to think about it!! Meanwhile this drama between parties should please stop.
Sir @megadrive, your words here touches me. And I feel it but I might not be conversant with the issue or problem between you and sir @double-u. All am asking is that you both should please get along. The of you are of high profile on blurt. Imagine if this continue what will now be the case and fate of other people when they are faced with this same similar problem.
Please let peace reign.
I don't mean to offend any one.
Thank you.
#peace
Please both parties @megadrive and @double-u should please settle your individual differences! You two are of high profile in blurt ecosystem. This scene you guys are creating almost Everytime is totally uncalled for! Am not siding anyone here, but what am wishing is peace! Thanks all!!!
#peace
Things have been hot here lately on Hive and Blurt. As many of you know I'm in process of crossing over and making this my new home, but I'm still a bit occupied fighting demons on Hive. I know it's not the most popular thing to do for some people here, but trust me things are not what they seem over there and exposing them is the right thing to do. It will soon be very clear who is primary suspect with the blurt hack upon startup almost two years ago now.
But on this matter with up voting yourself, with all due respect to @double-u I agree with @megadrive.
"Regarding self-voting I actually don't care if people vote themself 100% all the time, it's a free world, but it would not be very sociable and you may not reap the full community-building benefits of being part of Blurt."
and from a straight business perspective... to my understanding everyone holding blurt power is entitled to their small % of the reward pool via their up-votes. So in a free market those are here votes and she can decide on how she wants to use them, including reap the reputation as the girl who just up votes herself.
Furthermore, what is the harm done to blurt, price of blurt, the community, the blockchain?
Would adding restrictions to what people can and can not do with their up votes strengthen blurt or weaken it?
I think this is a slippery slope, and when going down a path of vote restrictions, the risks far outweigh the rewards in my honest opinion.
https://blurt.blog/blurtgerman/@double-u/closed
Ha Ha Ha! How funny! Oh yes – when the pub's owner called me one time (was still his best buddy) on the phone and complained about @jaki01 (remember the big reward discussion), I told him that Jaki has a "stick in his ass" when he is in discussions. That was meant friendly because Jaki is my ever lasting blockchain buddy. In discussions he's like a tree, You can bow him, but I never saw him broken until today.
The pub's keeper was very pleased about my words and thought I stand on his side and opinion because of accusing Jaki has a stick in his ass. Again: Jaki's standing in discussions was meant. I don't know how this expression sounds in english but Jaki knows I'm his friend and he is mine since five years and a half.
This is again an attempt to drive wedges between people. The rearguard action of an unmasked schemer. Anyone who drags passages from confidential private conversations into the public domain in order to denounce must truly be in despair.
I had a vague idea when I said the "stick in the ass" thing that it would blow up in my face again. This bad guy wants to embarrass me but embarrasses himself to the bone. Including a whole blockchain.
Keine Sorge, ich bin tatsächlich ganz genau so stur, wie du das ausdrücken wolltest. :)
Wir kennen und schätzen uns lange genug. Keine Sekunde habe ich gezweifelt, wie du das auffassen würdest. Der Intrigant hat aber geglaubt, dass ich es so meine wie er es verstanden hat. Dass er es heute, nach einem Jahr, auf den Tisch packt – der Mann muss verzweifelt sein.