RE: 2021-KW 47 ~ Kneipe 24/7 ~ Treffpunkt ~ Dauer-Kneipe ~ Ohne Zusammenhang / Without Any Context ~ [GER/ENG]

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

2021-KW 47 ~ Kneipe 24/7 ~ Treffpunkt ~ Dauer-Kneipe ~ Ohne Zusammenhang / Without Any Context ~ [GER/ENG]

in blurtgerman •  3 years ago 

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass sehr viele User ihre Blurt-Power an den Upvote-Servive tomoyan delegieren.
Was ist denn davon zu halten?
Vom Prinzip her finde ich das nicht sehr nett. Man delegiert seine Blurt-Power, um selbst Votes zu erhalten, hat aber keine oder kaum noch Blurt-Power, um andere User zu voten.

I noticed that a lot of users delegate their blurt power to the upvote-servive tomoyan.
What is to be thought of it then?
From the principle I find this not very nice. You delegate your blurt power to get votes yourself, but you have no or hardly any blurt power to vote for other users.
Or do I see this wrong?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Wenn man Blurtpower an tomoyan delegiert, dann erhält man jeden Tag flüssige Blurt aber keine Votes. Votes (muss man nicht selber sein, können auch andere Blogger sein) erhält man nur wenn man den Link zu einem Post dort eingibt.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Mich nervt die tägliche Auszahlung . Da freut man sich hey eine neue notification und dann ist es nur eine Überweisung von 0,310 Blurt

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Lol increase the delegation in case 🤣

But notification are annoying actually. Maybe a week is better as month is long

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

It is not that the amount annoys me but the daily notification. Getting daily a small amount of blurt was nice when we did not have the 25% Liquid Blurt .

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Ich fand die tägliche Auszahlung zu den Zeiten gut als es noch keine flüssige Blurt als Rewards gab. Die Erinnerungen der täglichen Zahlung ist wirklich etwas nervig. Kann man leider nicht muten.

There can be various reasons why a person might delegate the blurt power :

  1. If the person is inactive on blurt and is unable to use his or her blurt power.
  2. like you said that people are delegating to receive votes just like we see on many other Blockchain like on steemit there is justyy , nutbox , upvu etc who run a service.

Conclusion : It is my personal opinion only and i would love to know others opinion.

For me i am not able to vote regularly from my blurt power , i have 17000+ and i use to vote using it but i am unable to stay consistent so for me i found it wasting more than using so i delegated it to tomoyan and upvu.

I also respect your point of view as well and the only thing i don't like about voting service is that it votes post based on power delegated.
Be it a good , bad , or plagiarism post.

thank you.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

You don't have the time to vote each day but you have enough time to create a post each day? Oo

  ·  3 years ago  ·   (edited)

yes , because i not bound to write anything professional and few days i can just share what i did today or how my day went but for voting i can vote 10 post a day with 100% and that means reading ten post for which i don't have time. I have delegated my power recently ( the entire amount ) i have been Curating others for months though when i was free and was practicing work from home.
I do miss to write but that is very less likely.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Yes delegation is best.

It's just that giving rewards and votes depend on person running the service.

Anyone can run same service as the code is open source with some tweaks and different values

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I don't think these upvote services are social for the community!
What would you say if I delegated all my power?

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

You are right. They must be some balance. Also, the blockchain active members can better reward those who consistently engage with others blurtians.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

The problem really is delegating to those services and not being social @double-u

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I think it’s ok to delegate 1/2… and keep half to be social and upvote others.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

It can be totally OK or an ultimate sin for some people.

  ·  3 years ago  ·   (edited)

This is true.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Look … If people go out and buy 1 Million Blurt to delegate to @Upvu… and earn from 1 post per day.. I think it is awesome.

Certainly within their right. But then, they also shouldn't be surprised when most in the community don't upvote their posts either and would rather share their stake allocation on those here who support others with their stake.

I'm finding myself really surprised by how many I'm in the process of cutting off from my votes because of this. Several who overall are quality posters, witnesses and such. But I believe for optimal growth of Blurt one doesn't seek every chance at optimal immediate profit and takes the time to invest in their neighbors here.

Tools like Upvu are seeing many delegate huge chunks of their stake for that immediate profit. Leaving sometimes crumbs left for their support of others. So they should be fine with receiving crumbs in return, or nothing even.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I undelegated to upvu… and will focus on Upvoting all good original content on my own

  ·  3 years ago  ·   (edited)

I think that's awesome. You are looked up to by so many for all you do for Blurt, and perhaps more than most (fair or unfair) your actions are examined as to how one should conduct themselves at Blurt.

Thank you for wanting more for the community that is within your grasp to give. It will be slow, so slow as to be unnoticable like when someone we know loses weight that we see daily it isn't so apparent as someone who hasn't seen the person in a while. But over time as we invest more in others one day we will remember back when so and so was just starting and now they are a dolphin, or perhaps an orca or whale and smile knowing that in our own small way we helped someone we grew to care so much for manifest the blessings we KNOW they deserve.

This system is so unique in blessing us for taking actions to bless others. I hate that I might come across like some televangelist at times, but I've seen so many examples personally where support I've been a part of has helped others eat, or buy diapers or pay a utility bill and such. When I stop and think about it all, how someone of low means like myself is blessed with such a tool that impacts another I'm in awe. Especially when I think this is all a dip for Blurt, that once others really see what is manifesting here in freedom, caring and abundance that one day I will see many otherwise unrealized dreams of mine manifest too.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Yes, only delegating and not interacting is non social.
But in any way they are supporting the blockchain by their power as it contributes.

It only is that the user may not have any interaction or content

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

If we see that as a way of votes when we delegate some power to tomoyan it becomes huge in total numbers so, we do get a nice upvote. Indirectly our power is used for people to get votes which is nice.

and for people who are not active here or want to take some break , for them these delegation services are nice.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Yes for inactive people it's great thing to Do.
It's like opening a fixed deposit with returns.
Only issue is rewards get reduced as percent share becomes low with time